User talk:SalamanderAI

Welcome!
Hello, SalamanderAI, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Your first article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
 * Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
 * and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place  on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 06:06, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
Hello, I'm TechnoSquirrel69. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Andrew D. Huberman have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 06:06, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Cosmic6811. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of Andrew D. Huberman. Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal Wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --  Cosmic6811  🍁 ( T ·  C ) 06:47, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Andrew D. Huberman, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. --  Cosmic6811  🍁 ( T ·  C ) 06:51, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Edit warring
Your recent editing history at Article shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Zenomonoz (talk) 12:27, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Zenomonoz (talk) 12:37, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:12, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:14, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

(Note: This isn't just about links. Promoting someone's "effort championing continuous improvement principles" in Special:Diff/1184596819 is similarly strange and needs an explanation.) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:44, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Comment
As I was one of the users reverting you prior to your block: It's wise to take a look at the guide to appealing unblocks. Specifically, you need to acknowledge that you broke the WP:3RR and that you were inappropriately putting a commercial link in the external link section (should be avoided per wp:ADV) despite other users reverting you, and posting 3 warnings on your talk page. If you are going to request an unblock, I recommend you take a break for a while before doing so. Then compose an unblock request with the guide to appealing unblocks in mind. 1. Acknowledge where you went wrong (edit warring, ignoring user requests you stop, and inappropriate external links), 2. how you will improve your editing in future, and 3. that you are interested in contributing got Wikipedia. Your unblock request didn't acknowledge where you went wrong, and instead complained about how the block was unfair. Avoid complaining. The block was fair, it might feel unfair because you didn't know the specific rules, but you were warned multiple times to stop on your talk page. You will be given far more leniency if you accept and apologize. Zenomonoz (talk) 22:30, 11 November 2023 (UTC)