User talk:Salihcpaasa

Speedy deletion nomination of Salih C P
Hello Salihcpaasa,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Salih C P for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Melaen (talk) 12:59, 26 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Even without the copyright issues, the article would not have been suitable for Wikipedia, and would have been deleted, for a number of reasons, including the fact that it was written in unmistakably promotional terms, rather than from the neutral point of view that is required for a Wikipedia article. My advice to new editors is that it is best to start by making small improvements to existing articles, rather than creating new articles. That way any mistakes you make will be small ones, and you won't have the discouraging experience of repeatedly seeing hours of work deleted. Gradually, you will get to learn how Wikipedia works, and after a while you will know enough about what is acceptable to be able to write whole new articles without fear that they will be deleted. Over the years I have found that editors who start by making small changes to existing articles and work up from there have a far better chance of having a successful time here than those who jump right into creating new articles from the start. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:09, 26 October 2016 (UTC)