User talk:Salila.sihou

Welcome!
Hello, Salila.sihou, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:New European Bauhaus, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page or you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Jamiebuba (talk) 23:35, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:New European Bauhaus


A tag has been placed on Draft:New European Bauhaus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Jamiebuba (talk) 23:35, 4 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello,
 * now that i know the reasons why the page was deleted, is it still possible to edit it ?
 * I totally get the reasons why but clearly, the purpose of this page is not to promote a company or a product, but to present an artistic movement launched by the European Commission, which makes date and reference like the historical Bauhaus movement. The point of view of this page is neutral and the content provides important information to the Wikipedia community about the context in which contemporary artistic projects emerge these last two years in Europe, so i think it deserves to be included.
 * Also, if you think that the presentation seems directed by a promotion purpose, i could obviously write differently some paragraphs with the help of someone more experienced.
 * Thank you for your time Salila.sihou (talk) 09:34, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Salila.sihou. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:New European Bauhaus, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Jamiebuba (talk) 17:01, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:New European Bauhaus


A tag has been placed on Draft:New European Bauhaus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. VickKiang (talk) 23:56, 13 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello!
 * The article you deleted is a presentation of an artistic movement, it is not at all a product's or a company's promotion. Can you specify the paragraphs that make it seems like that ?
 * Also, it's already published on the French Wikipedia and on the Deutsch Wikipedia.
 * Thank you for your time Salila.sihou (talk) 08:59, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
 * After the previous warning, you still created the page with promotional elements (almost all of the article uses non-encyclopedic words) that depict the company entirely positively, and only use refs from its own website (i.e., no secondary sources at all). Could you declare your COI, and have a look at Notability? VickKiang (talk) 00:10, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello VickKiang!
 * I totally get your remarks but I do not have a COI, i'm not related to the subject. Actually, I am an architecture student, I have no financial or promotional interest in writing this article. I am interested in subjects and initiatives related to architecture and contemporary issues such as ecology, so I seriously think that the New European Bauhaus (which is absolutely not a company but a movement) should be on Wikipedia.
 * On the other hand, I do take your remarks into account, indeed it is necessary to propose a plurality of sources about it. But since it is a relatively new movement (launched 2 years ago and still in development) most sources speak positively about it. Maybe this is precisely where the Wikipedia article can offer a more neutral and encyclopedic presentation. Is it possible to recreate the page so that I can rewrite the article in this sense? Salila.sihou (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. VickKiang (talk) 23:58, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

You have an obvious conflict of interest:


 * You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
 * There shouldn't be any URL links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
 * You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above.

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:New European Bauhaus


A tag has been placed on Draft:New European Bauhaus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. VickKiang (talk) 07:52, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Deb (talk) 08:26, 22 April 2022 (UTC)