User talk:Saliner

Speedy deletion nomination of Cnick


A tag has been placed on Cnick, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. SANTADICAE🎅 18:55, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Cnick for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cnick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cnick until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 10:52, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello. Thanks for the warning. I will reply you in the discussion.--Saliner (talk) 12:43, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
Hello, I'm TylerBurden. I noticed that you recently removed content from Zlatan Ibrahimović without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TylerBurden (talk) 14:35, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello TylerBurden. Thanks for your response. At that period this player (Zlatan Ibrahimović) was officially retired from international football, so I consider this period shouldn't be shown in statistics (0 caps, 0 goals for 4 years). You are right, I shouldn't made a change without explaining. What would you recommend me how can I do right now? Should I change it with an explanation or not? Thanks in advance.--Saliner (talk) 06:56, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I understood your reasoning, so I did not revert it myself. Though yes it would have been much better to explain that in the edit summary, instead of afterwards here. A different editor reverted you, citing that the norm is to include all the years from beginning to end of their career. You could discuss that on the talk page of the article, or on the editors talk page. See the edit history of the article for links to their talk page if that's what you'd like to do. TylerBurden (talk) 16:54, 20 July 2022 (UTC)