User talk:Salish Seas

Leregogy
Hi I’m a new page reviewer and I’ve been looking at this article you created. While it is well written I have some concerns about the references. The topics of Wikipedia articles are required to show that they’re notable, and they must do this by reference to multiple reliable independent sources. Looking at the sources you’ve provided, they seem to be authored by the creators of the neologism. Could you add any other sources, not authored by them, to demonstrate that the term has been more widely adopted? Many thanks Mccapra (talk) 16:03, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Leregogy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leregogy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Leregogy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:15, 8 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Would you please stop adding redundant "keep" votes on the AfD page? You already cast a vote in your first comment - adding multiples is not on the books. You are welcome to make further comments, but not further votes. I have appended your new text to your previous statement. Cheers -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 14:52, 18 July 2020 (UTC)