User talk:SallyHirshBordo

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bearian (talk) 22:50, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit to Georgii Nikitin
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Georgii Nikitin without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 11:52, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Georgii Nikitin
Please leave the tags in place. They aren't, in and of themselves, an indication that the article is going to be deleted, but so that other editors can see what improvement is needed and help make the article better. Katharineamy (talk) 11:52, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Widr (talk) 19:37, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Georgii Nikitin
You were just blocked for edit warring, and I see that you've edited the article again and made the same change as before. You need to discuss your dispute or desired change on the article's talk page and come to a consensus. If you edit the article again, and without reflecting a proper discussion/consensus on the article's talk page, you will be blocked again for edit warring. This is your only warning.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   18:22, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

You beat me to it
Thanks for protecting Georgii Nikitin - I just finished warning SallyHirshBordo for continuing to edit war despite being blocked for it just recently. You may want to keep an eye on the article; if disruption continues (and it might), the protection level might have to be kicked up a notch ;-)  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   18:25, 21 November 2016 (UTC)