User talk:SallySE

June 2011
Hello SallySE. You tagged "Patxi's Chicago Pizza" for speedy deletion, but you did not notify the article's creator that it had been so tagged. There is strong consensus that the creators of articles tagged for speedy deletion should be warned and that the person placing the tag has that responsibility. All of the major speedy deletion templates contain a pre-formatted warning for this purpose—just copy and paste to the creator's talk page. Thank you. Ol Yeller '''Talktome 14:49, 27 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Wrong. The template states the following: "Please CONSIDER" placing a warning on the talk page of the author.  I considered it and decided not to.  Thus, I did nothing wrong.  If the template had said, "You are required to place a warning on the author's talk page, you would have a point.  It doesn't, and you don't.--SallySE (talk) 21:41, 27 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Guessing you didn't read the notice. Feel free to keep hounding me if you want.  I already have the WP:SPI case written if you want to take this further.  Ol Yeller  '''Talktome 21:45, 27 June 2011 (UTC)


 * I didn't read what notice? The one I just quoted to you?--SallySE (talk) 21:49, 27 June 2011 (UTC)


 * The notice that isn't a warning or demand says that, "There is strong consensus that the creators of articles tagged for speedy deletion should be warned and that the person placing the tag has that responsibility." That's all.  I assumed good faith that you're a new editor with few edits and probably weren't aware of the consensus.  This simply furthers my suspicion that you're a sock.  Care to comment on that?  Ol Yeller  '''Talktome 21:51, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

You mean the text that you wrote above? Doesn't the official template (Please consider -- i.e., its optional) outwiegh whatever your opinion is on the matter? If you think it should be a requirement, aren't you allowed to advocate for thaht change or something? Until then, its optional, right? I'm a sock? I don't even know what your talking about! What's a sock? Seriously, what are you on? I'm not sure why your bothering me since I've done absolutely nothing wrong.--SallySE (talk) 22:01, 27 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Yes, it's an option and I never said that it wasn't. All it's saying is that lots of people disagree with what you did.  There's no reason to be defensive about that.  No need to blow up about it.  A sock or sockpuppet is basically a person who creates multiple accounts and poses as more than one person.  As your edits are almost identical to someone else who isn't a fan of me, your editing habits are similar, and you randomly choose to nominate an article I created for deletion, imagine my suspicion.  Are my suspicions completely unfounded?  What brought you to that page and why, as a new user, did you decide that it needed to be deleted?   Ol Yeller  '''Talktome 22:07, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Wowswers are you paraoid! Someone thinks one of your articles aint important or noteworthy enough for Wikipedia and you just go berzerk and accuse them of doing a sock puppet! But I can certaenly understand why someone isn't a fan of yours if this is how you communicate with people on a regular basis! Again, I've done nothing wrong. Your giving me crap for not doing something that's clearly optional. And screw you if you think I need to explain to you or anyhone else which articles i do or don't find interesting! What are you, the Wikiepida police? Leave me alone, sicky!!--SallySE (talk) 22:30, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Blocked as a sock puppet
You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. –MuZemike 22:33, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

You may contest this block by adding the text below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

As ✅ by CheckUser as the same person:



–MuZemike 22:33, 27 June 2011 (UTC)