User talk:Sallybegood/sandbox

Why does wikipedia prevent facts from being entered
Wikipedia is supposed to give its readers fact. Why then does it treats amendments made,which are factual, as acts of vandalism because they are not from reliable sources? Why does wikipedia treat reports made in newspapers as being factual when a lot of reports are fabricated and unreliable? why does wikipedia accept witness statements used in courts of law ,which are sworn under oath on a bible and form part of a trial,yet will not accept witness statements from other people to support comments made? People who may be needed to make court statements in the future yet not deemed trustworthy to make statements by wikipedia. People who courts deem as reliable witnesses yet not deemed reliable by wikipedia. People who would swear on the bible inside or outside a court. why doesn't wikipedia add additional comments boxes to each page so that such comments it deems as "acts of vandalism " within the main page can be placed so that readers can read and judge what it believes to be true and factual. Sallybegood (talk) 14:49, 15 January 2016 (UTC)