User talk:Salnjm

where is an administrator?
come already!

Let me just highlight the typical time line of events... IP addy is blocked. new account is created. New account requests unblocking as first edit. New account is unblocked. New account vandalizes like IP address. Lather, rinse, repeat.

Besides, if you just posted on MY talk page your not actually blocked from editing. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 23:05, 1 June 2007 (UTC)


 * The ip address was blocked for it's own "crimes". ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 01:14, 3 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I have blocked nothing! ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 02:36, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

User:sinepgib
Read it backwards.--Anthony.bradbury 20:26, 3 June 2007 (UTC)


 * In my view, this is not bending the rules even slightly, and the user in question has the option which I have left open to him, of choosing a different username. But you are allowed even encouraged - to take this to WP:AN/I if you wish. I stand by my opinion.--Anthony.bradbury 20:33, 3 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Of course, if you happen to be the same person as either of the editors mentioned in the above unblock request, then the issue of sockpuppetry might come to mind. I make no accusation whatsoever; but are you either of these editors?--Anthony.bradbury 20:46, 3 June 2007 (UTC)


 * My friend, I have accused you of nothing, and have said so. I have spoken only about User:sinepgib whose username is and remains unacceptable. Might I suggest, quite seriously, that this conversation should finish here, and right now? If you now wish to stipulate that you and this user are the same person then fine, do so. But it will lay you open to the charge of sockpuppetry, which, let me stipulate, I have not made and do not make and do not wish to make.--Anthony.bradbury 20:57, 3 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I say again, I have made no accusation. The username stays blocked short of a decision reached through WP:AN/I.--Anthony.bradbury 21:02, 3 June 2007 (UTC)