User talk:Salter212

Welcome!
Hello, Salter212, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions have removed content without an explanation. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! --Animalparty! (talk) 17:34, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

April 2016
Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! --Animalparty! (talk) 17:35, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Widr (talk) 17:46, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

.

It would help your unblock request a lot if you explained to us why you were removing those templates. HighInBC 18:00, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Just a reminder to one and all, the proposed deletion template reads: "You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason. Although not required, you are encouraged to explain why you object to the deletion..." (emphasis added). In absence of compelling evidence of intentional disruption, let's assume good faith, and not bite the newcomer or hold them to higher or arbitrary standards than what could plausibly be a misunderstanding of the many, many rules. Cheers, --Animalparty! (talk) 22:33, 30 April 2016 (UTC)


 * That does not mean that doing nothing except for removing prod tags at high speed is not disruptive. Clearly the user did not just happen upon dozens of articles at a high rate of speed, they are systematically going through them and removing them without any apparent regard. I am wondering how they even got a list of articles to rapidly remove the prod tag from, not something a new user would just happen upon. HighInBC 00:35, 1 May 2016 (UTC)