User talk:Saltine/Archive 1

speedy delete
can you explain the specific sections of my post 'Bravosolution' that caused you to delete it? i closely copied the format from the pages of my two largest competitors, which have been allowed to stand on wikipedia, so i can't understand why i'm being singled out for deletion. I can add the following external links/references:

http://www.sdcexec.com/web/online/Money-Issues/Supply-Management-Specialist-BravoSolution-Touts-Financial-Growth-with-2008-Start/14$10682

http://www.softwaremag.com/S_FocusAreas.cfm?Doc=The500

http://www.massin.eu/2007/08/bravosolution-acquires-mobile-workers/

http://www.spendmatters.com/index.cfm/2009/4/14/BravoSolution-Quietly-Becoming-One-of-the-Largest-Providers-in-the-Market

http://www.aberdeen.com/launch/report/market_alert/4787-MA-bravosolution-acquire-verticalnet.asp

http://www.gartner.com/DisplayDocument?doc_cd=155368

http://www.forrester.com/rb/Research/wave%26trade%3B_esourcing%2C_q1_2009/q/id/46492/t/2

http://www.amrresearch.com/Content/View.aspx?compURI=tcm%3a7-39195&title=Case+Study%3a+Manufacturer+Uncovers+Much+Needed+Working+Capital+With+Spend+Analytics

The last three are password protected, they come from reputable industry analysts, all of whom have Wikipedia pages of their own. Elizabethflynn (talk) 03:16, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, I will undelete the article. Sorry for the inconvenience. The problem is that we get so many non-notable companies trying to add themselves that it's easy to miss one that might be notable. In addition I do not believe the sources you listed were present when the page was deleted. I will make sure it does not get speedy deleted again but it still may be nominated for deletion by others. Thanks. Evil saltine (talk) 09:58, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Star Trek TNG1.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Star Trek TNG1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —MetsBot 18:45, 9 December 2006 (UTC) I put Image:Star Trek TNG1.jpg up for WP:IFD. It's obsoleted by Image:Star Trek TNG title credit.jpg that is cleaner, smaller size, and under a better/more descriptive name. Cburnett 23:22, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Reverting
Thanks alot- I had thought that only admins could revert... Shows that I still have much to learn about Wikipedia. (Knowing this makes dealing with vandalism a much more palatable prospect.) --maru 19:31, 4 May 2005 (UTC)

Interested in an L.A.-area Wiki meetup?
It appears as though L.A. has never had a Wiki meetup. Would you be interested in attending such an event? If so, checkout User:Eric Shalov/Wikimeetup.

- Eric 19:52, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Interstate 5
Hope you don't mind. I reverted the infobox images for the US Highways in California to reflect the CA US Highway Shield. We've been trying to do this for all infoboxes where CA and Interstate Highways cross a US highway since the outline w/US shield is the official shield in California, not the one the other 49 states use. Gateman1997 22:34, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

Jimbo Wales to Attend San Diego Meetup on October 18 2005
Hello, Jimbo Wales will be in San Diego to attend OOPSLA and has agreed to come by and visit with the San Diego wikipedians. If you are interested, you will find more info on my talk page. Johntex\talk 00:54, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

Image:Campfire in pit.jpg
The image is incomplete without copyright holder. --80.185.23.191 23:46, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

TFC
Greets! I remember there was an Evil Saltine in the old game back in the day, would'nt happen to have been you would it? Cheers, BadMojo*HOPE* AKA --R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 06:37, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Re: Scientology
Your recent edits of that article state: "hidden truths only revealed.." And I would attempt to communicate with you in this area, if you are able. Scientology is maybe 25 million worlds. Even in the 1950's Hubbard told his view of the Physical Universe. I'm saying, there are confidential items. Call them hidden truths if you think they are truths. But they are not about the nature of the physical universe. He published all of that in the 1950s. For example, in "History of Man" he stated his view of the age of the physical universe, and there are many many other examples of his statements. The OT levels (confidential and if you prefer, hidden from public view) don't have vast secrets of his views but instead are about more or less specific trauma that have happened in the past. Except OT I which isn't about the past really and isn't a secret really, except for it methods. Terryeo 22:26, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I think you may have me confused with someone else. I was only reverting unexplained blankings. Evil saltine 22:30, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Okay, perhaps I am mistaken, thanks for the reply and have a nice day. Terryeo 22:39, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

Unsure
I'm unsure how to use this Wikipedia comment system so I'll make this short. I'm the one that removed a lot of the ebaumsworld content because it's pure libel and bullshit. If you think that the majority of an articles inside wikipedia for the topic "ebaumsworld" should be about the site ebaumsworldsucks you need to pull your head out of your ass and resign from your position as editor.

It's your obligation to provide fair and unbiased articles, try to live up to that obligation.

-Sean &mdash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by Blackd0g (talk • contribs).

Reverts on Security.
I just wanted to thank you for your kindess in reverting all of the information back that some scalawag had deleted on the page about private security. It is indeed good to know that there are editors out there that give a damn about having more information on a changing subject rather than less. Thanks again! - Captain Jason 04:42, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

SOS
You have been pretty active on the Save Our State article. Would you mind taking a look at my proposal here?--Rockero 22:04, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Someone is making POV edits. I've already reverted once today, and don't want to get anywhere near the 3RR.  Would you mind?  Thx.--Rockero 22:22, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your help. I changed your modification. I had been using the title of the article as the title of the external link, which is why that link had "confront the racist" in its title. Problem is, it wasn't an actual "article", (just pictures) and with that title it was begging for some vandalism. Which is why I changed it slightly. We sacrifice some consistency to deter vandalism. Seems like a decent trade-off to me.--Rockero 03:32, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

you just deleted my contribution.
hey, it wasn't an attack page or anything malicious. i was just writing something humorous about a friend of mine and you deleted it. thanks a million. &mdash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jiminytoespage9 (talk • contribs).

Possible New Article for West New York'o philes
A prominent newspaper editor who worked for papers like the New York Daily Mirror named Philip A. Payne lived in West New York, according to an article in the Jan. 29, 2006 Union City Reporter (which I assume was also printed in the Hudson Reporter's other area papers.) There is no article on him as of now, and I have other article I wish to work on, so as a suggestion, if anyone wants to make a one on him, and you want the article as reference, you can see it in full at: http://img368.imageshack.us/img368/9012/philippaynearticle7hw.jpg. You can also begin a section on Noteworthy Residents for that city's page (as I did for Union City), and place him in there. I'm sending this message to all the Wikipedians that I saw on the History page for the West New York article, so you don't have to respond to me about this. Nightscream 00:12, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

RE: deletion
Actually..yes I realise that now. Thanks.

Hey, could you tell me why the Sea Of Light does not show up in Category:Famous gems?

Thanks! --Kash 02:01, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Re: Vandalism
No problem. If people don't help each other out, this whole project is a waste. Liamdaly620 01:52, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Category:Labor organizers and Category:Trade unionists
Hi. Could you please explain to me why these are different categories? (it also goes for "Labor leaders and some others) Dahn 10:43, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Didn't get to thank you for reverting the attempted block by Cigammagicwizard. I don't really think they know what they're doing. (Pally01 18:31, 2 February 2006 (UTC))

Thanks!
Thanks for removing the copy vios from List of episodes of Power Rangers. Unfortunately, User:Rick lay95 chose to revert your edit. I've reverted the article back to an earlier version which takes out the copy vios (there may also be more further down, but I'll get to those as I work through the clean-up!) and also removes the entirely POV "Landmark episodes" section and the "Air dates" section which only duplicates info provided in the tables. It does also remove the images which were originally deleted, but see my comment on Rick lay95's talk page - if he wants to add them back in, I think he should do so properly rather than just clicking on revert and then having other editors work to remove the copy vios.

I'm not sure about the number of images being used in this article - the terms of fair use permit a "limited number" of screenshots for the identification and critical commentary of the programme, and I suspect that this article goes beyond a limited number, but for now my priority is to get rid of any remaining copy vios in the article and trying to get Rick lay95 to cooperate!

Thanks again, CLW 08:09, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Hi!
I called the people who deleted the pool for hours previously. I didn't mean to say it to you. I understand that you did it by mistake. Please accept my apology!

I am only trying to get a comprimise out of this mess!

Sorry about it again! 216.248.124.210 08:32, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my talk page. -- a.n.o.n.y.m  t 04:54, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Yes. Thanks also. Fightindaman 16:49, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Thank you!
Thanks for blocking my imposters, I really appreciate it! -- light darkness  02:10, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Removing bad alerts from AIV
Would it have been appropriate for me to have removed the requests to admin intervention if I was 100% certain that they were not vandalism (which I was), and were not directed at me, or is that an admin-only task? Thanks! Hipocrite - « Talk » 18:48, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Summary
Your summary at WP:AN was well done and appreciated. KHM03 00:01, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

Talk page policy
The page you cited at User talk:EllG73 is not policy. Please don't bully a user with it, as there are better ways to deal with disruptive users that should be saved for when it is truly warranted. - Taxman Talk 05:30, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Vandalism is policy, and it's listed there (under "Removing warnings"). I would have left it alone if it wasn't for the personal attack. If he had removed the warning, he would have been warned over and over by different people anyway. Evil saltine 05:41, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * So it is, but that's a pretty new criterion, and it was being repeatedly applied just because the user was removing comments. Sometimes it's better just to de-escalate instead of adding fuel to the fire. - Taxman Talk 15:42, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

vandalism
i see that you have blocked the ip 202.91.79.34 before.. well.. he/she has been doing a lot of vandalism today too. see contributions

on the same note, i believe that the user 'missuk' is the same person. see contributions

-Aksi great 11:58, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

User talk:12.210.1.200
He's asked for three admins to look at the case and make a decision; so I wanted to know if you would like to look at the case. He promised ME he would never vandalize again, I don't like it when people come back on their promises; he deserves a permanent ban. As I said I am going to ask three admins: you, User:Nlu, and User:Antandrus. --Holocron 15:25, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

128.180.211.16
Thanks for blocking. ¡Dustimagic! ( T / C ) 06:04, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, ! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. AmiDaniel (Talk) 05:23, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Image:Windup alarm clock.jpg
Hi you did upload on 25 November 2003 this image without an explicit license given and later somebody else did add the GFDL tag to it. As now again somebody else did move it into Commons without giving a proper description with author and such I just want to ask you if the GFDL licensing of that image is ok, so that I can make a proper description in Commons. I also want to assure that in future there are no further questions... Cheers, Arnomane 20:51, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. I have now improved the description in Commons somewhat see (used standard description template and sorted it into a category), so that this image can be found easily in future. Arnomane 14:57, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

VandalProof 1.2 Now Available
 After a lenghty, but much-needed Wikibreak, I'm happy to announce that version 1.2 of VandalProof is now available for download! Beyond fixing some of the most obnoxious bugs, like the persistent crash on start-up that many have experienced, version 1.2 also offers a wide variety of new features, including a stub-sorter, a global user whitelist and blacklist, navigational controls, and greater customization. You can find a full list of the new features here. While I believe this release to be a significant improvement over the last, it's nonetheless nowhere near the end of the line for VandalProof. Thanks to Rob Church, I now have an account on test.wikipedia.org with SysOp rights and have already been hard at work incorporating administrative tools into VandalProof, which I plan to make available in the near future. An example of one such SysOp tool that I'm working on incorporating is my simple history merge tool, which simplifies the process of performing history merges from one article into another. Anyway, if you haven't already, I'd encourage you to download and install version 1.2 and take it out for a test-drive. As always, your suggestions for improvement are always appreciated, and I hope that you will find this new version useful. Happy editing! --AmiDaniel (talk) 02:20, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Calling your attention to the Security Guard Page...
Hi again! Since you were kind enough to keep an eye on this page earlier, I wanted you to take a look at it again. I have noted my position regarding the recently added picture on its discussion page and would appreciate it if you could weigh in on the admissibility (or inadmissibility) of this picture. Thanks! Captain Jason 15:22, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Re: User talk:24.200.155.147 (Bill O'Reilly "bigot")
User talk:24.200.155.147

Actually, I was just curious to see how quickly it would be removed. I'd heard you guys were fast... lol. Anyway, it won't happen again. :-)

thank you
i enjoyed your comment on my rfc page, even tho i have a bad streak, you pointed out that this wasnt at my fault, and it nice to have someone agree with you once, even if its only one out of 30 things.--The Nation 05:13, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Anytime. Evil saltine 05:38, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

its okay commen mistake, were basically the same person according to our views and how much we hang out, jk--The Nation 04:58, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Univerity of California, Irvine
Sorry to bother you directly, but can you look into the University of California, Irvine page regarding the recent parking POV issue? The editor is back again and I really don't want to slam into 3RR. Thanks. -- Gogo Dodo 07:18, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for semi-protecting the page. -- Gogo Dodo 16:27, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the quick revert on my userpage! It is greatly appreciated. --TeaDrinker 21:50, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the rvv on my user page! Cheers! Anger22 22:20, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

repeated deletion of warnings
The report regarding is not a "npov dispute". has been repeatedly removing warnings from his user talk page despite repeated warnings and removed his 3RR warnings AFTER the final warning. In the process, Bonafide.hustla has also clearly broken the 3RR on his user talk page. See here for evidence:, , , --RevolverOcelotX 10:02, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

IP 67.21.64.157
Hi Evil saltine. I see you have blocked this IP on July 28 and commented that the IP belongs to a blocked account. The IP is harrassing User:Wafulz by email (you can read my convo w/ Wafulz at my talk page). I also blocked the IP one day later but want to know about what you know re this IP. -- Szvest 16:24, 19 August 2006 (UTC) Wiki me up

:-)


has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!!!-- ¿  Why  1  9  9  1  ESP. | Sign Here 02:19, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Bomb-omb SM64.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Bomb-omb SM64.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:26, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Survey Invitation
Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. --WikiInquirer 01:15, 4 March 2007 (UTC)talk to me

Orphaned non-free image (Image:NCC 1701-D1.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:NCC 1701-D1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:22, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Good Charlotte self titled.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Good Charlotte self titled.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:30, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Nick Arcade flying carpet game.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Nick Arcade flying carpet game.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:32, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Mentok the Mindtaker.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mentok the Mindtaker.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:20, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Legends of the Hidden Temple (assembling monkey).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Legends of the Hidden Temple (assembling monkey).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:19, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Legends of the Hidden Temple (Fogg and Olmec).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Legends of the Hidden Temple (Fogg and Olmec).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:19, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Jimmy Neutron title.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Jimmy Neutron title.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:56, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Mentok the Mindtaker.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Mentok the Mindtaker.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:53, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Harvey Birdman, Attorney at Law title.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Harvey Birdman, Attorney at Law title.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:38, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:WGBH web logo.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:WGBH web logo.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. After Midnight 0001 04:43, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:King of the Hill alley.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:King of the Hill alley.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Until ( 1 == 2 )  04:56, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:KGTV logo.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:KGTV logo.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. After Midnight 0001 15:45, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Puke & Snot requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Pilotboi / talk / contribs 07:08, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Legends_of_the_Hidden_Temple_(moat).jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Legends_of_the_Hidden_Temple_(moat).jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  15:58, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Legends_of_the_Hidden_Temple_(steps_of_knowledge).jpg
I have tagged Image:Legends_of_the_Hidden_Temple_(steps_of_knowledge).jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  15:59, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Attack Retrieve Capture logo.png
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Attack Retrieve Capture logo.png. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:13, 11 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 19:13, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Legends of the Hidden Temple (Fogg and Olmec).jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Legends of the Hidden Temple (Fogg and Olmec).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:28, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Knott's Berry Farm logo.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Knott's Berry Farm logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:32, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

American Megatrends
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article American Megatrends, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 20:14, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Scrambled cable channel.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Scrambled cable channel.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:49, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:KOCE_logo.png
I have tagged Image:KOCE_logo.png as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Use rationale examples. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 21:11, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Corporation for Public Broadcasting logo.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Corporation for Public Broadcasting logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:31, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Chong from Cheech and Chong's Next Movie.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Chong from Cheech and Chong's Next Movie.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:KUSI logo.png
Thanks for uploading Image:KUSI logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:50, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:KSWB-TV logo.png
Thanks for uploading Image:KSWB-TV logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:17, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hawthorne Heights - If only you where lonely - 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Hawthorne Heights - If only you where lonely - 1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:51, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HawthorneHeights.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:HawthorneHeights.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


 * He's community banned, so going to SSP is pointless. The fact that he's a sock is blatantly obvious by his edits. JuJube (talk) 22:40, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Not obvious? Check the history of the other socks; they've all done the exact same Nickelodeon/Jetix/bizarre crossover type of hoaxes that this guy is doing. JuJube (talk) 22:53, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Danny Daniel. I've had to deal with this idiot a long time as his vandalism occasionally hits Zatch Bell!-related articles. JuJube (talk) 22:57, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * NP. It's just that blatant hoaxmongers tend to get under my skin. ^_^ JuJube (talk) 23:07, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Protection of my talk page
No, no problem, I'm just trying to work out if I've offended someone or whether it's just a random attack. By the way, are you on #wikipedia-en-admins, or did you just find me on RCP? J Milburn (talk) 23:52, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Malcolm McFee
Are you going to delete McFee?? 216.194.3.106 (talk) 02:05, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for fixing my user talk page.
He's persistent, you gotta admit. That's twice as of this comment. Casull (talk) 09:28, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Deletion Reason
Dear Sirs, I have dedicated a text on " Superpipe" to the Wiki. Unfortunately, It has been deleted by the administrator. I don't know why. Please check & let me know.

Thanks & Regards, User:Pipeproducer —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pipeproducer (talk • contribs) 11:34, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism- Thanks

 * Hi, just wanted to say, thanks for cleaning up the vandalism from my user page. I've been so busy fighting vandalism that I didn't notice my own user page, had been vandalised. Thanks again :) Steve Crossin (talk) 12:07, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

75 IP
The TW edit summaries are definitely blockable, so if he does it again... --Rschen7754 (T C) 21:48, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Re:Rollback
Thank you very much! New tools on the Wiki will be interesting. Gwandoya  Talk 19:12, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:NTLDR selection menu.png
Thank you for uploading Image:NTLDR selection menu.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:33, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Block needed?
Hi, Evil saltine. I noticed that you blocked for 24 h for a personal attack on user:Allstarecho on March 2. The IP has now made another personal attack on Allstarecho, which was reverted by user:Adambro. Adambro also issued a vandalism warning - 5 minutes after a warning from another editor for an unconstructive edit. Given the nature of the personal attack, the fact that it followed so close after the previous block, the fact that the same editor was targetted, and the lack of constructive edits in the meantime (as shown by the contribution history), I thought you might believe a more forceful response was appropriate. Thanks, Jay*Jay (talk) 01:17, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Andy Pearson - why has this been deleted?
Evil saltine I added a page for Andy Pearson yesterday and it is the first time I have used Wikipedia. I then forwarded the link to Andy Pearson himself so he could have a look at it himself however he couldnt find anything as you had already got rid of it. We do the PR for Andy Pearson and I have written plenty of copy for him previously. Please would you tell me why you deleted this page, and why it was assumed to be an infringment on copywright when I wrote it?

I still would like to add the page again for Andy Pearson so please tell me how people normally go about this as I don't see I have done anything wrong.

Thank you

Talia Giles 80.89.88.232 (talk) 09:50, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:KSWB-TV logo.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:KSWB-TV logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:08, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:King of the Hill alley.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:King of the Hill alley.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:16, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:PBS 1971 id.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:PBS 1971 id.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:33, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Jefferton Alive!!!.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Jefferton Alive!!!.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:09, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:3RR5-multi
Template:3RR5-multi has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 14:09, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppet case involving 75.47.*
Suspected sock puppets/Artisol2345 (2nd) -- KelleyCook (talk) 22:34, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Space Shuttle Columbia disaster
As you are a significant contributor to this article I wanted to make certain that you are aware that its GA status has been put on hold following a GA Sweeps review which can be found here. The major issue needing some attention is citations. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 15:11, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:KBNT logo.png
Thanks for uploading Image:KBNT logo.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 03:52, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Law_of_cosines_proof.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Law_of_cosines_proof.png, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:02, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:C_sharp_Major_key_signature.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:C_sharp_Major_key_signature.png, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:36, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:I-805_Northbound_at_CA_905.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:I-805_Northbound_at_CA_905.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Jordan 1972 (talk) 22:36, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

File:Seven segment display 0 digit 8px spacing.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Seven segment display 0 digit 8px spacing.png, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Skier Dude ( talk ) 06:10, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Good Day!
Good day, Mr. Evil Saltine! I had reported IP address 121.54.100.146 on Administrator intervention against vandalism, and thank you for your prompt reply in regard to that report. You advised me to consider a dispute resolution with the said IP address, however, I believe there is no edit dispute between me and the said IP address. I think he has been given enough warnings despite a lot of edits providing wrong information to many articles. Should I keep an eye on him, and probably report him the next time he does that again?

Thanks, and God Bless. axrealmdotcom (talk) 04:11, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Brajbilla2007
I see you declined to take action against Brajbilla2007 at AIV. What is the appropriate recourse against a user who violates unambiguous policy even after an explicit warning? Bongo matic  04:13, 8 May 2009 (UTC) Should you wish to reply, please do so here. I will watch this page for a few days, so no talkback or other comment on my talk page is required.
 * I apologize, I made a mistake with the time. I still think more than one warning is necessary, though. I will be watching the page. Thanks for your hard work. Evil saltine (talk) 04:20, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Have given another warning. Haven't investigated any of the editor's other challenged activities (there seem to be a few). Thanks for taking the time to reply. Bongo  matic  04:39, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Floppy disk drive top (cover removed).jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Floppy disk drive top (cover removed).jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:04, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token d8b2d55dc62c38063fbeb8606d268fc2
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Hello
Hi. Are you free right now? I just thought I'd let an admin know that AIV has appeared to be unattended for over 20 minutes. Are you willing to look at those accounts?-- The LegendarySky Attacker 06:39, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure. Thanks for letting me know. Evil saltine (talk) 06:46, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * My pleasure. As a rollbacker and recent changes patroller, I just hate seeing vandals get away with what they are doing so I'm always happy to inform an active admin whenever AIV is unattended. I don't think we have spoken before but I'm pleased to make your acquaintance. Cheers and happy editing. ;)-- The LegendarySky Attacker 06:49, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Evil saltine
Your username does not make any sense, Evil saltine, your name just sounds like an evil cracker. You change your name due to this... look at your userpage!!! Bus Master-Transit Bus Saturday, July 22, 2009 11:33 PM —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bus Master-Transit Bus (talk • contribs) 02:36, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * (I'd point out the irony here, but it'd probably go right over the kid's head...) Half  Shadow  03:05, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Master Shake
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Master Shake. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Master Shake (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Sordello da Goito
Hello, I think I have the hang of this REDIRECT thing now, please let me know if there's still a problem. Sordello da Goito (talk) 01:25, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Request for arbitration filed
This is to let you know that I've filed a request for arbitration at Requests for arbitration concerning a case in which you have commented at Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive560. I have not listed you as an involved party; should you, however, prefer to be considered involved, let me know and I'll add you to the list. --Lambiam 12:10, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Topic Ban on Brews ohare
For your information, I have already been topic banned for exactly the same thing on a much lesser scale. I have added my opposition to Brews's topic ban at AN/I along with yours, but it has already been removed by the administrator who wants to ban Brews. I want this to be noted because that administrator is taking things too far. David Tombe (talk) 03:16, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Self-Promotion?
Hi, I notice that you blocked User:Thepoliticalguide. I have just responded to a post of his (apparently his first and only) at Talk:Barack Obama, wherein he reference-links the eponymous site twice. I noted that he was red, which I interpreted as not having created his own user page yet, and I neglected to visit his talk page, where your block was indicated. Should the alleged self-promotional links be removed from the Obama talk page, or how is this handled? I've been here awhile, but I primarily stick to the editorial side of things and am not that well-versed in process. I'll watch this page for your response. Thanks, Abrazame (talk) 07:37, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi there. It looks like he was asking a sincere question, and his username was the only problem, so I'd say it's okay to leave the comment. I wouldn't object if someone removed it though. Whether or not his website is a reliable source is another question altogether. Thanks. Evil saltine (talk) 07:42, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

RedPawl
Not being critical, but I think that this user is going to need an indef block as their edits are consistently the same - the editor's only purpose seems to be to push 'Cornwall is a country' which is clearly pov and wrong. It can be left until next time of course, as there will be a next time. Dougweller (talk) 13:13, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't expect much change from him either, but an indef block would need to at least take place at WP:AN/I. He's been around long enough that there would need to be some kind of consensus to permaban him, and he's not an outright vandal, just an obstinate POV pusher. Evil saltine (talk) 13:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Hard sometimes to tell the difference, continual edit warring.... anyway, next time ANI I think. Dougweller (talk) 15:10, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Cheaper by the Dozen 3 AfD
Okay, so I'm really confused. When I saw the article, I didn't see anything in the CSD that would apply to this, so I nominated it at AfD. Why didn't my AfD nom show up as an edit conflict if he was deleting the article just as I was marking it for AfD? Also, why would it then show that I created the page when it definitely existed prior to my AfD? Not overly urgent questions, but just trying to understand a little more of how WP works! Thanks! Frmatt (talk) 14:49, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Never mind, Kingpin just answered it over on my talk page! Thanks anyways! Frmatt (talk) 14:51, 8 September 2009 (UTC) No problem. Evil saltine (talk) 14:53, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

September 2009
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''Please don't use Wikipedia to make a point. I understand the purpose of the rape allegation, and I even agree with the point that they're trying to make (guilty until proven innocent), but it has no place on Wikipedia. '' — Mike :  tlk 04:26, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Oops! You reverted a few seconds before me and I warned the wrong person. Apologies! — Mike :  tlk 04:30, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem. I got a little confused myself with all the reverting. Evil saltine (talk) 04:31, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Diarmuid O'Mahuna GAA Club - Please give us some time before you delete this information. This club is as notable as any other GAA club - of which there are proabably hundreds if not thousands with entries. You left me with no time wg\hatsoever. This is totally unfair. (Pmunited (talk) 16:59, 9 September 2009 (UTC))
 * I am sorry, but please read Notability (organizations and companies). The article gave no indication that the club might be notable. Evil saltine (talk) 17:38, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Twitter on Glenn Beck
I mistyped an edit summary, and you are likely to question it so I will clarify here.

WP:ELNO bullet point #10, under "Except for a link to an official page of the article's subject—and not prohibited by restrictions on linking—one should avoid:", you will find

Links to social networking sites (such as MySpace and Facebook),[2] chat or discussion forums/groups (such as Yahoo! Groups), Twitter feeds, USENET newsgroups or e-mail lists.

Thank you — Mike :  tlk 19:39, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I disagree, but I won't change it back. There is a relevant discussion here: Wikipedia talk:External links. Evil saltine (talk) 19:44, 9 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I may have reacted a little quickly here. As I'm sure you know this page is a target for some serious POV pushing (from multiple viewpoints) and vandalism. Sometimes people with honest intentions don't get as much of the benefit of the doubt as they should. Especially considering the way Beck uses his twitter feed (i.e., "Watch Dogs: FIND EVERYTHING YOU CAN ON CASS SUNSTEIN, MARK LLOYD AND CAROL BROWNER. Do not link before burning to disc."), it seems to be particularly un-encyclopedic to include. I did read through the discussion you linked, but I don't think that Beck's feed warrants making an exception to the established policy. — Mike :  tlk  19:50, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * No, it's not a problem. Reading the footnotes on External links I think you are probably right. Evil saltine (talk) 19:55, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Unambiguous Advertising or Promotion
Can you please explain the specific sections of my post 'Stratacache' that caused you to delete it? I closely followed the format from the page of our competitor, which is currently listed on wikipedia. Each time I've attempted to post our page I've revised and removed any "unambiguous advertising or promotion" and tried to make it a reference page instead. Can you please help me pinpoint which specific sections need to be revised? I have added external links and references to reputable digital signage companies. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Digsig101 (talk • contribs) 13:05, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Great user name.
Thank you for a smile. I am trying to visualize what would distinguish an evil saltine from a friendly one. Do they hang out at the back of the tube of crackers? Or do they only appear in those packages with cheese or peanut butter, like a gang? Paint themselves with ultra-hot sauce so that, when eaten, the muncher suffers horribly? ;0)~

All the best, and thanks again. - Sinneed (talk) 00:04, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmm.. I'm not sure =) Thanks, lol. Evil saltine (talk) 00:05, 19 September 2009 (UTC)