User talk:SaltyBoatr/sandbox

As a premise, I assume we all agree:
 * 1) That the 'definition' section of the article needs more pro-gun POV to achieve balance.
 * 2) That the topic 'Right to Bear Arms' is one of the most contentious in US politics, and therefore in Wikipedia.
 * 3) That because of this contention, passionate editors from all POV's are drawn to edit on this article.

So, the questions are:


 * 1) Do we agree to follow the WP:ARS 'Generally accepted sources' guidelines?
 * 2) If yes, then how closely shall we follow these guidelines?   Strict?  Moderate?  Loose?
 * 3) If strict or moderate, where specifically in WP:ARS does a direct quote from a court document meet the guideline.
 * 4) If loose, then how shall we decide which sources are acceptable?
 * 5) Are direct quotes from court documents are acceptable, even if better (strict or moderate) WP:ARS sources available?
 * 6) If yes, what responsibility do we have to verify and explain the context and authority of the court document?