User talk:Salvatoreg

New article
Hi! The problem was a copyright violation of the original text. Nothing wrong with the subject. You can use the website as a reference, but the content here has to be in your own words. Hope this helps. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 17:23, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Well, I can't post the content here, but I'll gladly e-mail it to you since it appears your e-mail is active. I'll do that right away for you. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:10, 11 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Oops...scratch that. Looks as if you've already rewritten it.  Please let me know if you'd still like for me to e-mail you the original.  Nothing here is ever lost, but not everything stays in public view.  :)  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:11, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of CardioCareLive
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article CardioCareLive, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Notability not verified by any third party refs. All ghits appear to be press releases of commercial outfit.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. &mdash; G716  &lt;T·C&gt; 03:25, 15 February 2009 (UTC)