User talk:Sam11012

Welcome!
Hello, Sam11012, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Mastoi has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place   before the question. Again, welcome. Fyddlestix (talk) 02:05, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Mastoi
While I applaud your efforts to expand the Mastoi article, you are going about it incorrectly. You are citing sources that do not verify the facts you introduce, and you are creating a page whose formatting is completely broken. I recommend that you create a sandbox article (perhaps at User:Sam11012/Sandbox or User:Sam11012/Mastoi) and test your edits there. Don't copy them back to the main article until the formatting works correctly, and don't introduce sources that do not actually verify the facts in question. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:21, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Your edits to Mastoi have now been reverted by three different editors. Please do not restore them without discussing them first. Wikipedia works on a basis of consensus: you cannot rewrite the page in this wholesale fashion if many other editors disagree with the editing. The way to arrive at agreement is through discussion. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:41, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Writting a artical


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Writting a artical. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Mastoi. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Mastoi – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Flat Out (talk) 05:08, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mastoi. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Flat Out (talk) 05:09, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please Stop
Your recent editing history at Mastoi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Flat Out (talk) 05:38, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Please work with other editors to improve Mastoi rather than demanding your changes be kept. Flat Out (talk) 05:40, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Mastoi with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Winner 42 Talk to me!  18:59, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Mustoi_Balouch
I moved the article to draft space. Article must be referenced and must be in legible English. Bgwhite (talk) 05:22, 28 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi Sam11012,
 * I know Wikipedia's a complicated space, so I've fixed the page name on an article that you were working on. The word "Wikipedia:" should never go in front of an article name.  Pages that are named "Wikipedia:Something" are for pages about how to write articles, not for the articles themselves.  Readers almost never find an article that begins with "Wikipedia:", because the search results ignore such page names by default.  If you're still working on the page, then you have four options:
 * Draft:Mustoi Balouch (current location)
 * User:Sam11012/Mustoi Balouch
 * User:Sam11012/sandbox
 * Mustoi Balouch
 * The last, of course, is where all articles should eventually end up. You can move the page to that name by choosing the very first item, "(article)", in the pop-up menu on the special page for moving pages to new names, not "Wikipedia".  Please don't move the page back to anything that starts with "Wikipedia:".  Articles don't belong there.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:56, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Flat Out (talk) 06:57, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Mastoi. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 12:05, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Mustoi Balouch for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mustoi Balouch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mustoi Balouch until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sitush (talk) 17:16, 10 June 2015 (UTC)