User talk:SamCordes

Ways to improve 2007–2008 Israel Football League season
Hi, I'm Willsome429. SamCordes, thanks for creating 2007–2008 Israel Football League season!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add more reliable sources to the page, especially for the results tables and awards.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

 Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 13:23, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Robert B. Sinclair) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Robert B. Sinclair, SamCordes!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"In general, a well-written article, but be careful about close paraphrasing."

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:43, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Israel Football League Logo Updated 2018.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Israel Football League logo.png
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Israel Football League Logo Updated 2018.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Israel Football League Logo Updated 2018.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:28, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Rollback granted
Hi SamCordes. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3ASamCordes enabled] rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Nakon 05:58, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

Long Beach Unified School District
Samcordes, thank you so much for helping me to edit the LBUSD article. Keep in mind that I always try to make the Wikipedia project better! I never try to hurt it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.65.90.61 (talk) 02:15, 16 December 2018 (UTC)


 * No problem 69.65.90.61, and happy editing! SamCordes (talk) 04:16, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to WP:STiki!
Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.

December 2018 blitz bling
Thanks for all of your contributions and happy editing in the new year! – Reidgreg (talk) 18:06, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you Reidgreg, and happy new year! SamCordes (talk) 22:30, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Seasonal Greetings

 * Thank you Everedux! All the best to you as well! SamCordes (talk) 16:22, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Monde Selection Revert
Thank you SamCordes for the kind note after revert my editing, it's very warm to know the revert reason, rather than deleting without any notice. You even provide me the guideline! I am the fresh man who are crazy at clean label trend and would like to focus the traditional cooking gourmet. Hopefully back to you soon once I finished all the reading :)
 * No problem S1091300205, feel free to reach out anytime, and happy editing! SamCordes (talk) 17:39, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Howard J. Green
Alex Shih (talk) 00:01, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Seattle Totem Pole
Hello! Your submission of Seattle Totem Pole at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Cúchullain t/ c 15:54, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the review, I've addressed the first three issues and I'll try and refactor all the citations using WP:SRF to address the final concern. I'll let you know in the nomination entry when I've finished — hopefully today! Thank you again, SamCordes (talk) 18:08, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Freedom Football League) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Freedom Football League.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

signed,Rosguill talk 22:54, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I'll look into that when I get the chance. SamCordes Talk 23:10, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

January 2019 GOCE drive bling

 * Thank you! SamCordes Talk 23:10, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Pioneer Square totem pole
— Maile (talk) 12:02, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pioneer Square totem pole
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pioneer Square totem pole you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caeciliusinhorto -- Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 17:01, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pioneer Square totem pole
The article Pioneer Square totem pole you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pioneer Square totem pole for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caeciliusinhorto -- Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 17:01, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Women in Red
Hi there, SamCordes, and welcome to Women in Red. I see you have made a good start with your interesting article on Elizabeth Whitney Williams. I hope there will be many more. I see you have also written several articles on football. Perhaps you could contribute to WiR's focus on sports over the next two months. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 09:10, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you! I'll definitely look into sports for my next WiR article. Cheers! SamCordes Talk 01:42, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

your recent rollback on my edits
--Samiam5129 (talk) 20:34, 18 July 2019 (UTC)samiam

Hi this actually was my first edit and this is my first message so please correct/direct me if I am doing something the wrong way.

Please explain how you feel the article (sukkah) was better before my changes if most of what I corrected are well known (to most orthodox Jews) factual mistakes (see the Hebrew version) Would you like I show my sources? Thank you
 * Hi, thanks for reaching out! Sorry for not providing a more detailed revert message, I'm happy to expand. Yes, you should be citing reliable sources when you add or change content and, upon reviewing your changes again, I may have been a bit harsh in reverting them as I was thinking it was perhaps too much detail and read better before. However, I can't claim to be an expert on Sukkahs and I'm not fluent in Hebrew in order to read the Hebrew article, but I'm assuming good faith on your part and I'm happy to review your changes again with cited sources and get the article to a state we're both happy with. Let me know if I can help in any way and welcome to Wikipedia! (also, be sure to add   to the end of your message in order to sign your name, but other than that you did everything correct! :) --  SamCordes Talk 04:04, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Hey there
Lol hey, I'm not really active anymore but received a notification that someone mentioned me. Enjoyed reading your self-intro. Glad you came back for more. :) · Andonic  contact 21:30, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for reaching out! I'm glad to be back. It was fun digging through some old edits to try and put that little intro together. Thanks again! (and sorry for the joke edits way back then)  SamCordes Talk 16:51, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Charity Lamb
Vanamonde (Talk) 00:02, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Golden earring moontan
Hi,

you removed my change.

It's about this: It contains the radio hit "Radar Love", and was voted best Dutch pop album ever by readers of music magazine Oor in 2008.

It's not true, it was voted as number 9: see -> https://oor.nl/news/oor_presenteert_50_jaar_nederpop_inclusief_de_50_beste_nederlandse_popalbums_aller_tijden/

The link you use gives an error so that's a bad reference.

So your statement is not true. Please accepts my changes. Or should I do it my self?

Thanks,

René — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rene.titulaer (talk • contribs) 05:19, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reaching out. The source you provided is a good source so feel free to make your proposed change. Looking back at the edit in question, looks like I originally reverted the edit because you also included the text "guns" at the start of the article which I interpreted as a test/vandalism edit, but the rest of your edit looked fine. Thanks, -- SamCordes talk 19:03, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Gavrilo Princip
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gavrilo Princip you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 10:01, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Gavrilo Princip
The article Gavrilo Princip you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Gavrilo Princip for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 12:20, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Gavrilo Princip
The article Gavrilo Princip you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Gavrilo Princip for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 09:21, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

October Events from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Israeli american football 19-20
Could you create the article IsraeliIdan (talk) 19:25, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the delay in getting back to you, I just created the article: 2019–2020 Israel Football League season. Thanks, -- SamCordes talk 05:33, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Soapy Smith, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Confidence man ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Soapy_Smith check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Soapy_Smith?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:23, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

December events with WIR
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:44, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Mineral Wells "Controversies" edits
Sam, Not sure how one is supposed to protest you guys supporting fabricated "information" but consider this a formal complaint having tried twice to correct the Controversy section and reduce the unnecessary damages already done. As in this case, it's pretty much impossible to find published articles to cite which are disputing the articles a nefarious newspaper editor published on hear-say of events which never happened. And most people wouldn't morph matters of personal preference into becoming "controversial community-wide issues" like sanctuary city thing trending, unless of course they wished to turn it into something to slander and injure someone's image over. But if a person happens to run a local newspaper and wishes to hurt someone, cranking out fake news articles with the right catch-phrases inserted, long enough or calling in a marker might get some other paper to print something to cite ... after all, since the anti-propaganda act of 1945 was repealed, much easier to sell lies than the truth. However a small town editor may get something to cite, it's good enough to spread fake news to Wikipedia and inflate the perception of credibility even more, no matter how much damage it causes individuals or entire communities, as it is doing in this case.

As I noticed the deception in progress and attempted to correct it, first by deleting, then by adding the facts which were omitted ... in reality. Articles to cite over events which never happened ... yeah right. There was never verifiable investigations initiated by either our county Sheriff nor by the Texas Rangers, nearly a year after the fact. The complaint/accusation was quickly rejected by the local Sheriff, who suggested the complainer's only recourse was to take it to the Texas Rangers instead. The local paper repeated the same type of garbage three times a week for months until it was obvious there was nothing to it, the same garbage Wikipedia now retains, Wikipedia is being used. The Controversial sections should be deleted, this is not the understood usage of the service Wikipedia stands for. You are letting this guy make a mockery out of it. We do have controversy here, but the local newspaper isn't publishing anything about that because it's chief editor along with his cronies are being served their defense summons as multiple federal suits are beginning next week. We have been prohibited by the federal court from providing sources. Sincerely, Joe Swirczynski POB 733 Mineral Wells, Tx 76068 westexjoe@nxlink.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keepingthetruth (talk • contribs) 00:02, 2 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi, thank you for reaching out and providing additional context. All contributions to Wikipedia need to be verifiable and maintain a neutral point of view with no original research.


 * I felt that your additions of


 * "merely attempts being made by Mavid Day the editor of the Mineral Well Index to continue his vendetta against the Mayor with no regard towards the damage to the city's image Mavid Day repeatedly incurs. This is false news reporting at best."


 * and


 * "The dissenting votes can be attributed to the on-going attempts to remove the Mayor which have spawned a number of new civil lawsuits which are expected to result in criminal charges filed on the certain individuals for past participitation in violating statutes in both the US and Texas Constitutions"


 * violated those principles. Feel free to add additional, cited information to the article in order to provide further context if you like, but all additions have to be cited and maintain a neutral point of view. Let me know if I can provide additional information, and I'm happy to help get the article to a state we're both happy with.


 * Best, SamCordes talk 02:42, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Congratulations from WP:STiki!

 * Thank you! -- SamCordes talk 16:47, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Mineral Wells "Controversies" edits
I am confused about what to do to get the edits expunged from the "Controversies" section. Perhaps just not including it. With the litigation currently in process I don't believe I have the liberty of citing any references at this time. Thank you.Keepingthetruth (talk) 19:31, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure the content should be removed, and please look here for more info. I don't know all the particulars of the allegations, but if there is indeed open allegations against the mayor with litigation in process, then that seems suitable to include in a government controversies section. Prematurely dismissing the allegations and calling them "fake news" seems like speculation.


 * However, if you'd like to get the input of additional editors, the Mineral Wells article has a talk page as well and I encourage you to post your reasoning there where perhaps a consensus can be formed.


 * Best, -- SamCordes talk 16:46, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

February with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

DYK for City of Seattle (steamship)
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

September Women in Red edithons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

October editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

November edith-a-thons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:50, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

December with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

A New Year With Women in Red!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

April editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

May 2021 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:37, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

August Editathons with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:27, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

January 2022 Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

February with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Kalamboli
Hello, this is Bharati, a resident of Kslamboli for the past trhee and half yrars.I have written after knowing the thruth.It is difficult to tell the source as the information is based on media reports and individual experiences.You please do not chane the ingormation that I gave, since that is going to improve the future of the node.Kindly let me write.I am not writing this to defame the place.People need help. The reports about the node kalamboli are true as info is given by local police, people and media reports.It looks that it is true but it is difficult to verify the facts. Navicitizen (talk) 06:17, 26 February 2022 (UTC)


 * @Navicitizen Thank you for reaching out. I don't know your experiences in Kalamboli, and I am symphathetic, however Wikipedia requires reliable sources and no original research for all added content. If you can provide reliable sources, your contributions would be welcomed. -- SamCordes talk 06:33, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

March editathons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

April Editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:46, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

June events from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in July 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:49, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red August 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:59, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in September 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:38, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red October 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:01, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red November 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:36, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in December 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:57, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Women in Red January 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:04, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in February 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:29, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red March 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:55, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red April 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red May 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:29, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red - June 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red July 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red 8th Anniversary
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:02, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red August 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:26, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Orphaned non-free image File:Be&#39;er Sheva Black Swarm Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Be&. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

September 2023 at Women in Red
--Victuallers (talk) 16:59, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red October 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red - November 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red December 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red January 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red February 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:10, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red March 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red April 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:43, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red May 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red June 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red August 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:29, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging