User talk:Sam 1123

Hey, all! Post your comments below. Please don't have conversations, go use your own talk pages. Please don't bitch to me, or I'll hunt you down, then wrap you in a fur coat and nail you to a tree in the forest during grizzly bear mating season.

UK Barnstar
Looks good to me. Can you add it to the commons on commons:Barnstar/Barnstars of National Merit and the related categories? Just a suggestion -- Chris 73 | Talk 12:53, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Veteran Editor IV
Hey, Thanks! Nice star. I added it to my userpage. Many thanks again, best wishes, and happy editing -- Chris 73 | Talk

Image tagging for Image:DjimonHounsou.png
Thanks for uploading Image:DjimonHounsou.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:37, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

BoNM - Aus.
Hi. I will be rather busy for the next few days, please feel free to make a transparent background if you wish. Many thanks and happy editing -- Chris 73 | Talk 23:08, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Chosen Space
A tag has been placed on Chosen Space, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

not notable

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. GazMan7 16:56, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:SHL Full award cabinet.png
Thanks for uploading Image:SHL Full award cabinet.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 00:10, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Castle (animation)
I deleted that page because it didn't assert any sort of notability. If you can find some reliable sources that prove notability, you could recreate it and use them, though I find it highly unlikely that you could (a quick google search for "Oscar Johansson" castle shows only 400 results). Veinor (talk to me) 16:50, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Castle (animation)
I have added a "" template to the article Castle (animation), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -Panser Born-  (talk)  16:54, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Your RfA
Hello Sam 1123. I hope you'll take this the right way, but I strongly suggest you withdraw your RfA. I would be utterly astonished if you receive more than a few "moral support" type votes. When you come back to RfA ready for it in a few months, it will, in my opinion, look better for you that you chose to end the RfA yourself and everyone will happily chalk it up to your inexperience round here. Yours kindly, --Dweller 09:44, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Nagty-logo.jpg
Hello, Sam 1123. An automated process has found and will an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that is in your userspace. The image (Image:Nagty-logo.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Sam 1123. This image or media will be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. This does not necessarily mean that the image is being deleted, or that the image is being removed from other pages. It is only being removed from the page mentioned above. All mainspace instances of this image will not be affected Please find a free image or    media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 00:16, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Acrassicauda, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 99DBSIMLR 16:48, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Join us?


Speedy deletion of Template:User Nagty
A tag has been placed on Template:User Nagty requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 04:18, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

File:Olympic-rings.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Olympic-rings.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Powers T 14:22, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Incomplete table
Template:Incomplete table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:59, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Incomplete table
Template:Incomplete table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:34, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Incomplete table
Template:Incomplete table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:51, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Portal:Explosives
Portal:Explosives, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Explosives and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Explosives during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:45, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:VC Barnstar.png


The file File:VC Barnstar.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 18 December 2019 (UTC)