User talk:Samanthali123/Nectar robbing

Your work is very well integrated into the rest of the article. There is already extensive literature present on this Wiki page, so it is admirable that you were able to add in more info than was already there. I would recommend going over your work again and looking at the grammar, it could use a little bit of work. Everything else is good, and does not really require too much editing in depth. Excellent job, keep up the good work.

peer review
Your section on floral larceny is clear and informative. I think it would be more readable if you separated it into paragraphs; in addition, the sentence defining what floral larceny is is in the middle of the section, while it would make more sense for it to be at the beginning given that it is the title of the section. I would also add more links to other Wikipedia articles if possible, particularly for anatomy terms like "corolla" and "calyx." This is really minor, but I think early bumblebee doesn't have to be capitalized (at least based on the article you linked it to?). Lastly, your section seems to be missing citations, so you should add those. Nice job! Bucketkitty (talk) 07:48, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

The additional content is relevant to the topic and is helpful for my understanding. The content that is added is neutral and without evident biases. If anything I would suggest including more information about current questions or subjects of inquiry in this topic. At this point in the drafting process, I can’t find any citations. These should be added by using the “cite” function on the editing page. There are no images in this article currently. It might be helpful to add an image depicting the physical effects and damages caused by nectar robbing behavior. This content is easy to read, and I did not pick up on any major grammar edits. Well done. The one place that I could see a bit of restructuring happening is the “Effects on plant fitness” section. The transitions between paragraphs feel slightly clunky and the topics of each could flow together better. The article is much more complete now. You managed to add in content without making the piece feel clunky and disjointed. Overall, great job! Ahm248 (talk) 08:42, 3 December 2021 (UTC)Anna Rose Marion