User talk:Samar/Archive1

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 15:39, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 16:20, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: Adoption
Sure, I can adopt you. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have about any area of Wikipedia. If I don't know the answer, I probably know who would. Useight (talk) 16:32, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * How did I know you were going to ask about images? Well, taking a looking at the article, I see that it does not have any images at all. Therefore, it could probably take one copyright image under the fair use clause. However, I would ask this question at Media copyright questions to find out if editors with more image-related experience agree with this assessment. Useight (talk) 18:07, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: Possible vandalism
Actually, if you take a look at the original version of the article, found here, there have always been "x's" there. I guess nobody has figured out yet what should be there. Useight (talk) 17:37, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to WP:CEng
Welcome aboard. Hope you enjoy editing and contributing to civil engineering articles. Not much is organised at the moment in WP:Ceng but the members just try to improve the civil engineering topics as a whole. Cheers - Dumelow (talk) 19:36, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * A lot of the current members are still in training, including me (3rd year student), so no need to worry about that! If you need a hand with a particular article or have any other questions please feel free to ask me, cheers - Dumelow (talk) 09:36, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: LUMS
Yes, I agree that the article has parts that are definitely not neutral, such as the section called "LUMS Library". Phrases such as "excellent sevices", "world-class squash courts", and "our motto" need to be taken out. Good call. Useight (talk) 15:03, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 * P.S. - I can deal with the newspaper copyright question a bit later, I need to head out to a job interview. Useight (talk) 15:05, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Newspaper image
Okay, according to this site, all newspaper photographs are automatically copyrighted when taken; apparently this is called Common Law Copyright. However, most photographers employed by a newspaper have signed the rights away to their employer. This makes the image non-free, and therefore, not as preferable as a free image. But we do have this template which declares our occasional use of a non-free newspaper image to be fair use. So, in short, it seems a newspaper image can be used, but sparingly. Useight (talk) 16:17, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Correcting spelling errors
See User_talk:Tabletop   Tabletop (talk) 09:56, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Blogs
You are correct, blogs are almost never acceptable sources. See Verifiability and WP:RS. Useight (talk) 14:51, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

DYK
Looking through the archives, it appears that May 17th of this year would be included in Recent additions 211. I also found at Talk:Whitney Ellsworth, that the Whitney Ellsworth article was in the DYK section that day, too. If there is anyone who can find exactly what was in the DYK that day, it'd be User:RyanCross, so for more info, I'd recommend asking him on this one. Useight (talk) 14:59, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

RE: Biology article
That article does needs some work. I can help with some cleanup, but I have never taken a biology class, so I can't help with the content. I also cannot think of any editors who are biology experts off the top of my head, sorry. I'll do what I can to clean the article up a bit, though. Useight (talk) 15:09, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

RE: National University of Modern Languages
I too thought that sentence was unnecessary, so I removed it. Useight (talk) 15:09, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to WikiProject Universities! :D
 Hi, and welcome to WikiProject Universities! Our goals are to standardize the structure and content of all college and university articles, improve Wikipedia's coverage of these articles (hopefully propelling them to featured article status), and serve as the central resource for all discussions and information related to colleges and universities on Wikipedia.

A few features that you might find helpful:


 * Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
 * The university infobox is one way we hope to standardize our coverage of university articles. All university pages should have this infobox, and relevant fields should be filled in and sourced.
 * Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you [ watchlist it].
 * The project has a few expanding departments, which handle article quality assessment, member recruitment and project awareness and article improvement collaborations.
 * We have a Student Affairs task force that focuses on Student affairs-specific articles.
 * We've developed a variety of guidelines for article structure and content, template use, categorization, and other issues that you may find useful.
 * Check out our to do list to get started!

If you have any questions please don't hesitate to ask one of the project participants or post a question on the talk page. We'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! — - Jameson L. Tai   talk ♦  guestbook  ♦  contribs  16:01, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: City infobox
To make a city infobox, you'd want to follow the template at Template:Infobox Settlement. There is basically a set list of items that can be included if desired in the infobox. The full list can be seen at that template page, but they include "name", "motto", "nickname", "zip code", "population", etc. I'll do a sample one here so you can see the basic formatting.

Hope that helps. Useight (talk) 15:51, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: National University of Sciences and Technology Assessment
Perhaps a citation after "getting chartered in 1993" in the lead paragraph. I'd put a comma after "Karachi" in the last sentence of the lead paragraph and a comma after "sciences" in the last sentence of the second paragraph. Under the heading "Academic divisions", the first sentence says, "its over 60 years old", which should be reworded. Under the sub-heading "Army Medical College (AMC):" it says, "(11 ft X 11 ft)"; I'd make that say "(11 ft. by 11 ft.)". In the same section it says "for Post Graduates students and for undergraduate students". I'd change that to "for Post-Graduate and undergraduate students". That same section has the word "cafeteria" capitalized when it shouldn't be, and I'd put a comma after "squash court" in that same sentence. That's what I've got from the first half. The rest will follow. Useight (talk) 08:41, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: Merge Articles
Are you sure they're the same river? If so, they should definitely be merged and the correct name should be used. The articles could also benefit from some cleanup. Useight (talk) 01:23, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Map copyright problems
Hi - Image:Pakistan rivers map.jpg is a very useful map but unfortunately the page you sourced it from has a copyright tag that is not compatible with GFDL. Wikipedia cannot reproduce maps that are under copyright restrictions.--Matilda talk 09:34, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Image permission problem with Image:Pakistan rivers map.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pakistan rivers map.jpg I noticed that that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:27, 9 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you; I have deleted it. I know that our copyright policies can be confusing. If you ever have questions about whether or not an image is usable, we do have a board where you can ask: WP:MCQ. I can help with text copyright questions, but images are not my major focus. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:19, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
 * That one is okay. :) NationMaster is a "Wikipedia mirror", a site known to copy Wikipedia articles. If you look at the bottom of that page, you'll see that it says, "The Wikipedia article included on this page is licensed under the GFDL." It's okay for other sites to duplicate us, as long as they give us credit. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:42, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Date of copyright
Hi you asked ''but the site from which it is taken, it states '©1997-2004 Wildlife of Pakistan-All Rights Reserved'. Doesn't that mean the copyright is expired?'' It doesn't mean copyright ahs expired - it is the date at which the copyright was established. Copyright can then last for many years after depending on the laws of the country - some countries have 50, others have 70 years. Regards --Matilda talk 19:52, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Wallpaper, images
Hi. I'm afraid I have no idea. As I mentioned, I do a lot more with text than images. The place to ask is probably WP:MCQ. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:55, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * No reason to be sorry. Nothing wrong with asking. :) You never know who has what bit of information on Wikipedia. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:07, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * As far as I know, you can upload wallpapers, as long as they are not copyrighted or meet the fair use policy. But I don't know when you'd need to use a wallpaper. If you have an image and you don't know its copyright status, it's usually better to err on the side of caution and not upload it. If you have an image from a blog that specifically doesn't have a copyright, then it can be used. And, yes, we can use old copyrighted images under the fair use policy if no free equivalent can be found. Useight (talk) 16:37, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

RE: Dan Wade
I have deleted the article. Thanks for the heads up. Useight (talk) 17:50, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: RC Patrol
No, there are no official requirements for joining the Recent Changes Patrol. Just start watching the recent changes and you're an RC Patroller. Useight (talk) 16:19, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:CSD - Page written in Russian
This recently tagged page written in Russian has a "translation needed" tag, as well as a CSD tag (the latter by you). I have translated it (see the Talk Page) - basically its just brief bio about a model (no citations or links etc). I don't know what to do with the tags etc so I've not touched them. Sorry but I don't know how to link it here either.Anyway,hope this helps! Plutonium27 (talk) 18:32, 29 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Yup,that's the one. Could be a test, could be a vanity - I'm not a admin and I'm sure glad it isn't up to me to sort these things out: ) Thanks. Plutonium27 (talk) 18:45, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:Islamabad_montage.jpg
FYI, I nominated the image for deletion on Commons as one of the images (upper right) appears to be a copyvio. I hope you can make a different collage. Renata (talk) 21:02, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token 9256604f93d8cb65ff5d4c825c57a8e2
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Re: Shock Jock (The Hardy Boys)
You have just tagged this new article as an attack page. It isn't. It is a stub for a children's book. (Thousands of Google hits to be found on it).-- Myosotis Scorpioides  13:30, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Re: Faridkot, Khanewal & Loni Tribe
I have replied on my talk page. Useight (talk) 16:26, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Re: Citations
I have replied on my talk page. Useight (talk) 16:40, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Re: James Piecowye
Replied on my talk page. Useight (talk) 16:20, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Re: Rollback
Replied on my talk page. Useight (talk) 15:32, 11 December 2008 (UTC)



Jake Wartenberg talk is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding to their talk page with a friendly message.

New Page Watcher
Hi, your request for access has been approved. Pedro : Chat  12:32, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that:) Marsa Lahminal (talk) 13:23, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Most welcome! Happy editing! Pedro : Chat  13:25, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Degree programs at NUST
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Degree programs at NUST, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Wikipedia is not a prospectus replacement.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Nuttah (talk) 15:27, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Eight Thousanders
The Eight thousanders in the Karakoram are not simply in Pakistan. Contrary to Pakistani POV pushers claim, they are on the border with China, and are claimed by India - an issue on which the international community is neutral. The column is headed "Location", so Karakoram is accurate and neutral. Viewfinder (talk) 09:40, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Parts of Concordia are located in disputed territory; however, the four mountains from the range listed in eight thousanders are located in the undisputed territory inside Pakistan. K2, K3, K4, and K5 are all located on the Pakistani side of the border. I'll try to find some reliable sources for it. You seem to be fairly knowledgeable in this field, so I guess Karakoram is fair enough. Cheers. Marsa Lahminal (talk) 15:17, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

P.S: I have found certain books and maps officially published by the Pakistani government stating it to be undisputed territory; I, however, have also found certain Indian claims stating the region comes under their territory. So we come to a point where official words of governments are no longer reliable. Hence, Karakoram is neutral. I will also suggest the range name for other peaks rather than country names for uniformity in the article, and probably a separate column for country (or alleged country). Cheers. Marsa Lahminal (talk) 15:54, 4 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Sorry, but the Karakoram 8000ers are on the border, not within Pakistan, despite the claims of many Pakistanis, possibly including Pakistani authors of official documents. Go to Talk:K2 and see in particular the link to the border agreement. Viewfinder (talk) 03:28, 5 April 2009 (UTC)


 * P.S:You rightly point out that despite official Pakistani documents claiming the 8000ers to be undisputed territory, India claims the region. Therefore the the territory is disputed. Viewfinder (talk) 03:39, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Dealing with wikireader
British Pakistani another pov pusher this time indian american has made it his life mission to deface pakistanis everywhere covertly adding original research to degrade pakistanis calling them terrorists and poor amongst others i urge you to delete all his trash and beware hes being backed by a indian admin by the name of nishkid its a solid nexus of indian vandals which needs to be broken cheers 86.158.235.93 (talk) 18:06, 27 April 2009 (UTC) Also if you take a look at the article it states that bengalis suffer the most from low incomes but the article British Bengalis is devode of any mention of this statitics its clear this indian is singling put pakistanis what makes it worse is that admins of hindu origin are also siding with him take a look at the diffs i also gave him a taste of his medicine by adding info on the British Indian article which irked both the vandal and his admin supporter they both changed the edit to make look less of a issue and immediately added that indians are rich above it lol well lets hope india reduces its poverty rate back home instead of abroad lol —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.158.235.93 (talk) 18:14, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Karakoram Range 2.jpg
Hi Marsa Lahminal! The picture you've uploaded is fine, but it has already been uploaded under another name. The other one is frequently used in different projects while yours is only displayed on your user pages. I'm going to nominate the picture for speedy deletion because it is a duplicate. Hope you don't bother. --88.153.183.4 (talk) 12:40, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Islamabad Portal
I have started Portal:Islamabad and Portal:Sialkot like other Portals of Pakistan and you are wellcomed to contribute. --TalhaDiscuss  &#169; 15:35, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Islam by country
Hello there. I disagree with your edits during December 2008 in Islam by Country where you removed the 'details' hyperlink. Like the Catholicism by country article, the details hyperlink means that readers may understand better that the link is about Islam in whatever country rather than simply the article about that country. I was thinking of changing it but I think I need your opinion first.Opticals (talk) 02:48, 23 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Dear Opticals, actually if you see the Roman Catholicism by country article, the country name leads to the article of country and the details lead to the article of Catholicism in that country. If you see Islam by country article, the country name leads directly to the article of Islam in that country. I was working on the article to make it a FL, however could not continue working on it. I still believe this is a better way to represent and Catholicism article should also be changed to this pattern. However, if you think it should be the other way then do take help of some senior editors about what would be better to make it Featured List. Cheers. Marsa Lahminal (talk) 07:15, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Regarding Old Warning
In regards to this: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:68.157.53.193&redirect=no

You have to understand that IPs can change hands, and some users(like myself) can end up coming to this website and wind up confused as to why we suddenly have such an odd message as that. I feel it should be prudent to be careful who you send warnings to, so that you don't end up inadvertently confusing others in the future. Best of luck. 68.157.53.193 (talk) 04:37, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

August 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Eeekster (talk) 23:54, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, if I can have just 1 more minute, I will add the references, as I have added to the article. You really need to relax a bit. Cheers ~ Marsa Lahminal (talk) 23:58, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The notice was intended to get you to add them. It appears to be working. Eeekster (talk) 00:00, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I added them before any notice and got an edit conflict :). Thankyou for your warning anyways. Regards Marsa Lahminal (talk) 00:03, 30 August 2009 (UTC)