User talk:Samar60

Welcome to Wikipedia
Welcome!

Hello, Samar60, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

JSR (talk) 11:34, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

PAK-FA an derivatives
Hi, what do you suggest? Brazil's contribution for PAK FA is given in the PAK FA article. If this is the same project, maybe we should write like this:
 * Sukhoi PAK FA / FGFA (maiden flight expected in 2009   )
 * Sukhoi PAK FA / FGFA (maiden flight expected in 2009   )

Flayer (talk) 17:22, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Well, if there would a Brazilian version, we'll ad it in the same way:
 * Sukhoi PAK FA / FGFA / Brazilian version of PAK FA
 * Sukhoi PAK FA / FGFA / Brazilian version of PAK FA

Flayer (talk) 18:36, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

FGFA
Hi Samar60 and thanks for your contribution on this aircraft.

I'm a little concerned about a couple of things, though. The biggest problem I have is that the article relies heavily on sources that do not meet Wikipedia's standards for reliability. In particular (apart from certain very specific exceptions), material posted to blogs may not be used as sources of information.

Would you mind taking another look at the article and replacing anything that you've cited to a blog with a citation to a source like a newspaper, magazine, government website; and removing any material that can't be attributed to a source like this?

If I can be of any help, please let me know. Cheers --Rlandmann (talk) 07:51, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

History of India
Hi Samar, just to let you know I do not believe in the "Aryan Invasion Theory" and am aware that even among the West, the theory has been modified to Aryan Migration. However, the main reason I reverted your edit was not because of that but rather citing Stephen Knapp doesn't meet our Reliable sources criteria. To understand the rules and how Wikipedia works, I suggest you read these policies: WP:NPOV, WP:OR, WP:RS and WP:V. Thanks! GizzaDiscuss  &#169; 12:23, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Confused apologies!
I have no idea what my warning was about, particularly as I never seem to have tagged that page with copyvio or even edited it. This is weird and somehow my mistake. I've removed the warning.-- R andom H umanoid ( &rArr; ) 16:43, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)