User talk:Samdacruel

Flying Ace
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --lTopGunl (talk) 20:04, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Huh? What do you mean? --Sam 02:35, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I mean removal of cited content is vandalism. I've added the quotation as well. It doesn't matter what you can & cannot do in computer games, you are being ridiculous. --lTopGunl (talk) 09:10, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
 * That was a joke.I was implying that 5 kills in minute is absurd. --Sam 15:41, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Removing sourced content is not funny. It is widely published, an international publication included, that I included and quoted in the references. Your implication is completely baseless. --lTopGunl (talk) 16:45, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
 * It is simply impossible for a person to score 5 kills in a minute. --Sam 17:13, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Battle of France
I see that you have removed the "citation needed" template in the article "Battle of France" with comment "It seems tactically obvious". I would like to note that it is not a sufficient reason for such removal. The problem is that this statement ("A determined attack by a fresh and large enough mechanised force might have cut the Panzers off and wiped them out."), taken at face value, while true, is irrelevant. Of course, a free extra Army Group would have defeated the Germans. And if the Allies had ten extra well supplied Army Groups, they would have won no matter what. I hope you will agree that under this interpretation this sentence is useless. Thus it has to be rewritten, saying something less abstract. And we do need a source for that. Finally, adding a good source never hurts (see Verifiability and related pages for more details)... --Martynas Patasius (talk) 19:02, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)