User talk:Samdacruel/Archive

Everybody Draw Mohammed Day
Hey! I noticed that you have previously reverted an edit at Everybody Draw Mohammed Day to declare it an annual event. I've was having a conversation with a new WP:SPA about why it isn't inherently an annual event. The conversation has degraded into two editors flinging derogatory words at me. The degradation of the conversation has resulted in the two editors pushing to edit war which I won't have a part of. I'm leaving this message here for you and any other editors who have been involved with the subject being an annual event or not as an invitation to either join the conversation or simply edit the page as you see fit. Regardless of your opinion and how it compares to mine, I feel like the situation is degrading and more eyes on the situation will only help work things out. Ol Yeller '''Talktome 00:14, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Homage
Can't say I have a strong opinion on the subject, but the NYT-Oxford debate's entertaining. Sounds like it's more or less valid either way.  Acroterion   (talk)   03:51, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I guess.Its fun arguing for a stupid cause.I was quite shocked on seeing a NYT arcticle on the "h" in homage.Sam 04:10, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Think before blindly reverting in the future
This same anon IP has returned again and again over the last few years to post virtually the same "OMG BLASPHEMY" message, never remaining to actually carry out a dialog on the matter. AGF is out the window for this sort of thing, so please, look into why something war reverted before blindly slamming the undo button. Tarc (talk) 22:34, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Really? Ah well..my bad :P Sam 02:16, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Talk for Rebacca Black
I wasn't using Talk:Rebecca Black as a forum, if you'd actually read the paragraph I was asking about the creation for an article. Also, you should know by now that you can't remove talk page comments just because you don't like something. • GunMetal Angel  16:16, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Ironic,considering my previous talk post :P Anyway,What you said was pure forumish and i think i have every right in reverting it.Sam 16:21, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Muhammed Images post...
Hi Sam, I think you meant to oppose on that page in this section. Qwyrxian was supporting leaving it with the calligraphy. Best, R OBERT M FROM LI &#124; TK/CN 02:31, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

the resaon (I think)
that someone reverted your edit at Men's Rights is that the definition of what the term "Men's Rights", means needs to be cited. What is up there now seems to be just one editior's opinion of what the article is or should be about. Perhaps you can find a citation or bettrr (in my opinion) come up with a better definition of "Men's Rights". Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 18:13, 21 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Oh,I had no idea.I just thought that it was a mistake or something.Anyway,someone already sourced it.Cheers --Sam 02:44, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Death figure on Iwo Jima
What's with the repeated reverts to the ludicrous figure of 46,000+ deaths on Iwo Jima? I defy you to find any source that supports this figure. I've got Morison's volume 14 on the Iwo Jima battle right in front of me, and when you add up the killed, died of wounds, and missing and presumed dead in his table of casualties, it does in fact come out to the number in the article, 6,000+. Given the "contribution" history of the editor who originally changing it to 46,000+, I strongly suspect that was deliberate vandalism. Leave it alone. --Yaush (talk) 15:50, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually,I did leave it alone.I edited it once,it was reverted.I checked my facts and apologized. Wrong page dude. --Sam 16:00, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Scratch that.I just noticed my mistake.Apologies :D --Sam 16:31, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Potential flame war
Hello,

Please allow me to intercede in the disagreement concerning the latest edits on Flying ace. I am an impartial party, even though I have often edited the said article in the past. I believe the present situation needs an even-handed intermediary.

Georgejdorner (talk) 05:31, 29 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Be my guest. --Sam 14:37, 29 October 2011 (UTC)