User talk:Samee/Archives/2016/December

Imtiaz supermarket
You have placed essay-like tag on ISM. Being a pakistani you also may knew something about this retail giant. If you think it is essay like then remove extra and not important material. Ayyanali2100 (talk) 06:13, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I tagged it while reviewing the newly created articles. The article is obviously a reflection of personal opinions. Wikipedia articles need to be written neutrally and should be backed by reliable independent sources. For your information, this article was previously deleted twice for unambiguous advertisement.
 * You have written in lead sentence that 'considered to be supermarket giant' and you have cited the main domain of the supermarket as a reference. This is not acceptable. Other subjective use includes 'store gained unprecedented popularity, 'in 2016 alone, the company is planning to open three more' etc. All this falls short of the encyclopedic standards.  sami  talk 11:35, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

I have heard your words. The first thing I want to tell you is that I have deleted all the copied content from my UserpageMain. Since I am new to Wikipedia and I am a 15 year old. I even don't know how to programme so that is why I copied content from your talk page. Furthermore I am not either associated with Imtiaz supermarket nor any of its subsidiary. I just wanted to make a Wikipedia article. I tried a lot but due lack of experience or little knowledge of programming I was not able to make it successful but then I realised that reference is necessary to make a successful Wikipedia article. But Imtiaz supermarket is a notable market chain in Pakistan. Ayyanali2100 (talk) 12:58, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * , well there is nothing wrong in copying as long as you give credit to the source in 'edit summary'. You may feel free to restore your userpage. I don't think anyone has alleged you to be associated with Imtiaz supermarket. I agree that the subject is notable, that's why it was reviewed 'okay' and apropos tag was placed on it otherwise it would have been tagged for speedy deletion as previously. There are more than thousands of Wikipedia articles who have maintenance tags placed on them, they remain there until the problem is sorted out. I hope you won't confuse the word 'dummy edit' I used on your userpage edit summary with dummy edit—a term internally used in Wikipedia.
 * I would also like to extend an invitation to join our WikiProject Pakistan, a Wikipedia based project committed to improving coverage on Pakistan-related articles. If you're interested, please consider adding your username here. Thank you.  sami  talk 06:09, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Vodafone logo.png
Thank you for uploading File:Vodafone logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:10, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Vodafone logo.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vodafone logo.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:49, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected
New Page Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC))

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected
AfC Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter #2
Hello ,


 * Please help reduce the New Page backlog 

This is our second request. The backlog is still growing. Your help is needed now - just a few minutes each day.


 * Getting the tools we need

Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:55, 11 December 2016 (UTC) .
 * Improve the tools: Vote here.
 * Reduce your review load: Vote here

14:01:33, 12 December 2016 review of submission by Sreevidhya Santhosh
Could you please help me with my article article--Sreevidhya Santhosh (talk) 14:01, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Type the subject of discussion here
Hi Samee, Can you help me to do this article with my bio so I can have it on Wiki. You were saying it reads like an essay. Can you be more specific in the correct way I should present this info about myself. It may be best if I have an editor to do up something for me.

Cheers, Kenny — Preceding unsigned comment added by KENNY WALSH (talk • contribs) 16:59, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

AppSheet submission
Hi there,

Wondering if we can get more feedback on the AppSheet Wikipedia submission you reviewed a few weeks ago. We noticed that it was in draft mode and was submitted by someone else, but has been rejected. It seems to be neutral in tone and has appropriate sources. Is there anything we can do to help fix this?

Thanks!

--Samin85 (talk) 23:15, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Please suggest me how to get this approved ?
I am creating an article for Joshua Travagli he is great footballer and he is notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.224.144.238 (talk) 19:00, 29 December 2016 (UTC)