User talk:Samee/Archives/2019/July

About his Edition
Please add the complete judgment. Abdullahmehar005 (talk) 15:53, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Thank you ...
... for improving article quality in July! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:30, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

司令官 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 司令官. Since you had some involvement with the 司令官 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 12:12, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Knuckles (echidna) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Knuckles (echidna). Since you had some involvement with the Knuckles (echidna) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 12:34, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Warid
Template:Warid has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Störm  (talk)  14:29, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I would appreciate your input on Maryam's discussion page. I'm quite new at contributing so I hope my inability to follow customs isn't a huge deal. I'm trying to follow Wikipedia's guidelines.
Vikhtrrez (talk) 12:31, 27 July 2019 (UTC)Vikhtrrez

バーク・ザ・ポーラーベアー listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect バーク・ザ・ポーラーベアー. Since you had some involvement with the バーク・ザ・ポーラーベアー redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 16:23, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Persian people RM
Can you explain what your closing statement at the Persian people RM, "No consensus per discussion with support !votes excluded", is meant to mean? Why would support votes ever be excluded? At this juncture, if you cannot answer satisfactorily, I will open a move review. It's quite clear that there was a consensus to move in policy. RGloucester — ☎ 17:08, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * It was to imply that mere votes have been overlooked and only arguments in the support and opposition were considered. I don't agree that it was clearly towards moving, although relisting might have been an option. Clearly, you may always go for move review for a wider outlook. samee  converse  18:57, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Move review for Persian people
An editor has asked for a Move review of Persian people. Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. RGloucester — ☎ 21:27, 30 July 2019 (UTC)