User talk:Samhawcroft

Firstly- welcome on board, I am delighted that we have a publishing professional working on the article. What you have said was flagged up 4 years ago, but couldn't be included, because on a high profile article, every fact must be qualified by a verifiable reference. We have two interesting paradoxes here: If this weren't about H&E, then an article in H&E would be considered a verifiable reference. Secondly: because of your position you are the person who knows, but because of your position anything you write would be consider to be a POV, or not independant. Administrators, would look at your contributions and see that they are entirely about the magazine you edit and that could be sen as SPAM, or commercial advertising. I haven't seen a copy of your journal for over a decade, my experience is limited to France and Germany, so I am just interested in being fair and preventing infighting and turf wars invading the article. In my experience, it is better to discuss any changes first on the talk page and when agreement is achieved, let A.N.Other to transfer the agreed wording over to the article page. Slower, but more long lasting. --ClemRutter (talk) 02:37, 11 February 2009 (UTC)