User talk:SamiAlrifaie

Masdar's reliability was discussed several times in the past among Wikipedia editors and it was decided that, even though its pro-government, its reliable when it comes to territorial changes. Its reliability was questioned when it comes to controversial topics/claims like massacres etc. In this regard it was found to not be always reliable and this is the topic for which it will not be used, or used only if backed-up by verifiable sources. As for casualty claims via Masdar, if attributed properly per WP policy, it can be used. EkoGraf (talk) 06:21, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't really care about the HTS thing. But in regards to the rebel casualties claim, please do not remove sourced info. The claim is properly attributed to the Army and we also include claims of deaths of government soldiers made by pro-rebel SOHR or Qasioun news when they are made (with proper attribution). EkoGraf (talk) 21:06, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Per your request, known pro-rebel source confirming HTS presence in Jobar. Also, reminder, the Jobar counter-attack towards Qaboun a few months ago was confirmed to be HTS-led by 3rd party/neutral sources, as well as pro-rebel SOHR. EkoGraf (talk) 06:34, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I added a newest pro-opposition report citing a rebel source that HTS is currently not present in Jobar. Now both views are presented, that HTS is there per the SAA and that in contrast the rebels are disputing it. EkoGraf (talk) 09:21, 20 July 2017 (UTC)


 * For pro-regime sources HTS always existed in any place or area regime and axis start an offensive against, they said that all the time, even casualties any normal person would never takes it as serious, 400 killed in 25 days of fights ??? seriously ? this is not a video game.

SOHR casualties numbers 20 regime and axis, 28 rebels looks way more realistic. anyway pro-hezbollah sources proved that Hezbollah is involved in the fight so you should add it.

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:10, 19 July 2017 (UTC)