User talk:SamiBerriwen

February 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Benghazi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GABHello! 18:38, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Benghazi. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. GABHello! 18:41, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Tobruk. GABHello! 18:42, 26 February 2016 (UTC) You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tobruk. Hmains (talk) 04:11, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism, as you did at Tobruk. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:18, 28 February 2016 (UTC)