User talk:Samisahiri

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Vienna Business School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. Thank you for helping Wikipedia! Alpha Quadrant   talk    05:44, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
 * Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

Clearly you have no idea what appropriate content is. Please stop making inappropriate edits.
You repeatedly are adding content to articles without any explanation that is not appropriate. This is disruptive editing and nor constructive. Your edits will all be reversed unless you are willing to try to make a case to convince other editors that you are correct. that happens on the talk pages. But your conduct so far has been obstructing and ultimately is vandalism. 99.192.52.78 (talk) 01:55, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Desperation Day. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.--Eaglestorm (talk) 00:06, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Not a Father's Day. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ''Neither of you have technically broken WP:3RR but do appear to be in a slow moving edit war over the inclusion of the material. I would suggest you discuss this on the talk page here.'' Jnorton7558 (talk) 17:22, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 23:08, 27 October 2011 (UTC)