User talk:Samjonespr

Speedy deletion of Fred Pearce
A tag has been placed on Fred Pearce requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pruneautalk 17:01, 19 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Pruneau: CSD A7 is for bios that don't assert notability: this one does: "one of the finest SF writers" in The Times. However I agree with you that in may not meet Notability (people), so please be fair to the newcomer, and take it to Articles for deletion and not speedy deletion.  --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 18:20, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Public relations
Hello: I am not sure if you have styled your user name after the noted fictional PR, or if you run a PR business yourself.

Either way, I guess I would like to warn you that PRs often find it difficult to rub along with Wikipedia volunteers, especially if they wish to edit articles about their clients. However, you may well find it worth the effort to deal with culture shock: writing encyclopedia articles is nothing like writing promotional material.

Some volunteers have written an article to help such people get acquainted: Conflict of interest. I hope that you find it to be useful to you: at least the parts that apply.

--Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 18:28, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Derk-Jan Dijk (January 12)
Thank you for your submission to Articles for Creation! ☺ I reviewed it. Please, see the detailed feedback I left at the top of the draft. Use the Edit tab at the top to address the issues raised, and resubmit for review. If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the article itself. Add your question at the top. It is useful to keep its discussion in one place. You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors. Thank you! Gryllida (talk) 01:22, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Derk-Jan Dijk (February 26)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. ''' Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! '''
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [.
 * Please remember to link to the submission!

Bjelleklang -  talk 11:43, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Derk-Jan Dijk concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Derk-Jan Dijk, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Derk-Jan Dijk concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Derk-Jan Dijk, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Derk-Jan Dijk has been accepted
 Derk-Jan Dijk, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!  DGG ( talk ) 05:52, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Samjonespr help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.