User talk:Samkaplan

Deletion proposal for Steven Kaplan
A tag has been placed on Steven Kaplan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. TonyAbou-Assaleh 18:56, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

If this page (Steven Kaplan) is an auto-biography, it would be more appropriate to put the content on your user page. TonyAbou-Assaleh 19:01, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

what to do
Ive removed the tag, because a full professor at Chicago is notable, but the article will absolutely surely be removed by someone else unless you: and in general meet WP:BIO and the burden of doubt engendered by WP:AUTOBIO You have a day or two, probably no more. DGG 04:17, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) add 3rd party sources for the career or reviews of the work
 * 2) add publications, as in a bibliography

Unspecified source for Image:Kaplan.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Kaplan.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:26, 6 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Iamunknown 23:26, 6 March 2007 (UTC)