User talk:Samlaskin

October 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Battle of Osawatomie has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:34, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Battle of Osawatomie was changed by Samlaskin (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.965326 on 2015-10-15T12:34:45+00:00.

May 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Warring States period has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:55, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Warring States period was changed by Samlaskin (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.962109 on 2016-05-12T12:55:15+00:00.

Speedy deletion nomination of Lars djuve


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Bentogoa (talk) 13:35, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been or will be reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 19:26, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Khmer Rouge, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Khmer Rouge was changed by Samlaskin (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959631 on 2016-05-13T11:16:29+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:16, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Indian Rebellion of 1857 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:04, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Indian Rebellion of 1857 was changed by Samlaskin (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950316 on 2016-09-26T13:04:55+00:00.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for harassing other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. – Gilliam (talk) 08:14, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: My sad life (December 9)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Enterprisey was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:My sad life and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Enterprisey (talk!) 03:15, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Westport, Connecticut. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. RolandR (talk) 16:28, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC) Frankly, I'm amazed you've been allowed to continue with your vandalism for so long without getting an indefinite block before. But it stops now. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:42, 9 December 2016 (UTC)