User talk:Samloveridge

Wikipedia is not for nonsense or vanity pages
Your articles Sam's modern dictionary and Sam Loveridge do not fit in Wikipedias concept of an encyclopedia. If you want a vanity page, you could consider using the user page, and if you like nonsense articles, please make them in the Uncyclopedia instead. Your serious contributions to wikipedia are welcome, however, but please refrain from adding nonsense.

Jens Nielsen 07:56, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.
 * Minervamoon 03:57, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Mel.png
Thank you for uploading Image:Mel.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih 15:18, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Andreas.png
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Andreas.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 20:51, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Nicole venditti
A tag has been placed on Nicole venditti requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. triwbe (talk) 12:46, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

File:101 0082.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:101 0082.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. — ξ xplicit  04:53, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Cutsock.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cutsock.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Skier Dude ( talk ) 04:04, 21 October 2009 (UTC)