User talk:Sammichael1

Copyright problems on Farm Security Administration
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Great Depression in the United States into Farm Security Administration. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required.Also, please add attribution when copying from public domain sources: simply add the template after your citation. I have done so for the above article for the material you copied from the Library of Congress website. Please do this in the future so that our readers will be aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:55, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Hannah Wilke
Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from http://www.hannahwilke.com/id10.html. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:27, 29 April 2018 (UTC)