User talk:SammySquidelz

October 2017
Hello, I'm RickinBaltimore. I noticed that you recently removed content from Rubus spectabilis without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:48, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rubus spectabilis. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. --Jules (Mrjulesd) 18:54, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Samuel Benastick concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Samuel Benastick, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:42, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:SammySquidelz/sandbox


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:SammySquidelz/sandbox, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. OhKayeSierra (talk) 18:29, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to [ trigger the edit filter], as you did at Louis-Joseph Papineau, you may be blocked from editing. OhKayeSierra (talk) 18:31, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 04:07, 5 December 2018 (UTC)