User talk:Samos Sanon

February 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Walter Evans-Wentz has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bblog(?:cu|fa|harbor|mybrain|post|savy|spot|townhall)?\.com\b (links: http://samos-sanon.blogspot.com:). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:56, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Bardo Thodol/COI
I deleted the link/reference book that you added earlier to the Bardo Thodol article. Based on your user name, and the fact that your account has primarily been used to link to pages and add mention of this book, I'm wondering if you are familiar with Wikipedia's Conflict of Interest policy. It's particularly important to note that edits that have the appearance of promoting or linking to works that you have a personal interest in are subject to a lot of scrutiny on Wikipedia to prevent abuse by advertisers and other promoters. If you are the author of the book that you are referencing, and you think there is a case to be made that it is a significant and notable source about this topic, it would be in your best interest to declare that unambiguously on your user page to make sure you don't run afoul of the COI guidelines. My concern with the book that you linked is that it does not appear to have any indication of its notability; the other books in the list are generally 1) by well-known or otherwise notable authors or translators, 2) a notable academic or popular translation, or 3) have their relevance testified by the fact that a major publisher- often one that specializes in this field- published the book. The book that you linked was very recently published, and was apparently published through a self-publishing service.  Something like that is generally going to be regarded as promotional linking, unless there are unusual circumstances that I'm unaware of.  --Clay Collier (talk) 23:38, 23 February 2009 (UTC)