User talk:Sampackgregory

Rozita Swinton
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Rozita Swinton, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? B figura (talk) 03:24, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Please see our policy
To quote from WP:BLP1E: "If reliable sources only cover the person in the context of a particular event, then a separate biography is unlikely to be warranted." In general, this has been applied over a wide range of people, including prisoners at Gitmo. Unless the person is notable for something other than that one event, we generally try to place the coverage into the main article. Best, -- B figura (talk) 03:45, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * That said, if the woman is actually notable for something else, than that would render this a moot point. -- B figura (talk) 03:45, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Runningback-1990s-stub
Hi - a stub template, category, or redirect which you created has been nominated for deletion or renaming at Stub types for deletion. The stub type, which was not proposed at WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, does not meet the standard requirements for a stub type, either through being incorrectly named, ambiguously scoped, or through failure to meet standards relating to the current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha?  04:16, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Argument from existence in time
A tag has been placed on Argument from existence in time, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. §FreeRangeFrog 06:26, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Argument from reason listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Argument from reason. Since you had some involvement with the Argument from reason redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Greg Bard 00:46, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:NewMapscoLogo.gif
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:NewMapscoLogo.gif, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:NewMapscoLogo.gif appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:NewMapscoLogo.gif has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:NewMapscoLogo.gif and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:NewMapscoLogo.gif with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:NewMapscoLogo.gif.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 06:48, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tommy Blake


The article Tommy Blake has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable. Does not meet WP:NGRIDIRON (never played professionally) or WP:ATHLETE in general. The one source still available only mentions him in passing with no indication why he is notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &mdash;Al E.(talk) 16:19, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)