User talk:Samral/archive1

Nomination of The Conspirators Hierarchy, the Committee of 300 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Conspirators Hierarchy, the Committee of 300 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Conspirators Hierarchy, the Committee of 300 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  04:49, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Conspirators Hierarchy, the Committee of 300.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:The Conspirators Hierarchy, the Committee of 300.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:58, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Advisory
Étienne Dolet (talk) 07:18, 1 April 2016 (UTC)


 * This is considered WP:TAGBOMBING. It's disruptive and please refrain from doing it. Instead, express your agreements at the talk page in a constructive manner. Étienne Dolet (talk) 07:26, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * , mən ingiliscə bilmirəm.--Samral (talk) 15:08, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Iranian Armenia (1502-1828). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. ''WP:TAGBOMBING, bout #2, same article. - '' LouisAragon (talk) 16:12, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

June 2019
Hello Samral. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Samral. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS (talk |c|em ) 01:12, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Tsakuri
Regarding your move of Tsakuri to "Hunarli", pointing to this article as a rationale is not sufficient. Wikipedia article titles for geographical places are largely determined by the common names of the localities, not their official names. If you believe there is a valid reason based on Wikipedia policy to move the page, please open up a move discussion on the Tsakuri talk page, since the names for the Nagorno-Karabakh towns and villages are largely disputed and controversial in general. See WP:AT for more information in general about Wikipedia guidelines for article titles and WP:NCGN for information about geographic names. AntonSamuel (talk) 09:27, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

License tagging for File:The Man on the Rails.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Man on the Rails.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:30, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Tarikh Aliyev
Hello, Samral. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tarikh Aliyev, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Tarikh Aliyev


Hello, Samral. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tarikh Aliyev".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! S0091 (talk) 19:34, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Mahammad Turkman moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Mahammad Turkman, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) In addition, there appears to be a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself.  Onel 5969  TT me 19:11, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
 * BBC, Trend, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, Voice of America : It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ???--Samral (talk) 17:19, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Please read the above notice.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:20, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I read. You please answer my question.--Samral (talk) 17:23, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 * If you read it, you would understand your question is irrelevant.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:24, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 * "Davam" is one of the founders and a member of the Board of the Republican Youth Movement.--Samral (talk) 17:18, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Rauf Arifoghlu moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Rauf Arifoghlu, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:08, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
 * You wrote the same thing again:  It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Most of the news sites are the most famous news sites of Azerbaijan, which are in the top 20 in the "Alexa" rating. Additionally, instead of drafting the page, you could add templates "More citations needed" and "Citation needed" to the page.--Samral (talk) 17:39, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 * No, I didn't write the same thing again, while similar, the messages are different. In this case, I went to the draft and removed all the uncited material. Since it's in draft, feel free to revert my two edits, but I thought that was the most expedient way to show you how much of the article was not cited.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:42, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Resources added.--Samral (talk) 17:56, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Rauf Arifoghlu for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rauf Arifoghlu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rauf Arifoghlu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:33, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Important query about interactions with other accounts
Hi, Samral. My name's Tamzin. I'm an admnistrator and SPI clerk here on the English Wikipedia. When you have a moment, I've asked a few questions at Sockpuppet investigations/Elshadiman that I'm hoping you can answer. Please don't edit elsewhere until you've answered these questions. Thanks. -- Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 23:08, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Mahammad Turkman for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mahammad Turkman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mahammad Turkman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 04:52, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ali-Morad Khan Zand, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Khan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

3RR
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - LouisAragon (talk) 14:36, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

AA2 advisory
- LouisAragon (talk) 14:38, 2 July 2022 (UTC)


 * @LouisAragon, My change is not against any of Wikipedia's rules. Samral (talk) 06:39, 3 July 2022 (UTC)


 * "My change is not against any of Wikipedia's rules."
 * Eh, yes, it is.
 * The two links which you tried to add, produced in the Republic of Azerbaijan, an entity without freedom of press (Media freedom in Azerbaijan) and a long-standing history of spreading historic negationism (Historical negationism), constitute a violation of WP:RS and WP:EL. In your attempt at inserting these two bogus links into Wikipedia, you violated WP:WAR too (attempt #1, attempt #2, attempts #3)
 * - LouisAragon (talk) 14:13, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Some excerpts from the first link:
 * "...and I went further to the ancient Azerbaijani city of Irevan."
 * "Another evidence of Armenian vandalism is the destruction of the Demirbulag mosque,"
 * "Like other material and cultural Azerbaijani monuments of Iravan"
 * "The cultural and historical genocide committed by the Armenian vandals spread not only to the Karabakh region of Azerbaijan, but also to the territory of Armenia, where there were more than a thousand Azerbaijani settlements, hundreds of historical and architectural monuments, caravanserais, palaces, mosques, mausoleums, tombs, cemeteries, tombstones, etc."
 * Trust me this won't look good at ANI. - LouisAragon (talk) 14:13, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)