User talk:Samsamgal96/sandbox

Peer Review
Akhargis1 (talk) 05:34, 1 November 2018 (UTC)Akhargis1
 * Good use of sources and citations within the sections
 * Good use of new sections, do you plan on adding these on as their own sections? Or as subsections of sections already present in the current article
 * I think impacts would be better suited as the middle section to create a better structure of cause, effect, and solution
 * Your section on Considering Porcine Future would be better with more length since it is an important aspect of the article.
 * There is a good perspective and doesn't give a feel of bias (good neutral content).
 * Good job with the additional sections. I feel like the article was already pretty well developed so you did a nice job finding information that would be beneficial to add. The main issue is adding more information to that last section.