User talk:Samsara/Archive13

Bronze wing again

 * Neutral. Seems oversharpened, esp. in the neck feathers. Samsara (talk • contribs) 12:35, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Interesting - considering you were happy enough to support this... --Fir0002 22:45, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Fir, can you stop following me around? This may be the last warning you will get before I take this further. Samsara (talk • contribs) 04:12, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * "...before I take this further" - now what do you mean by that threat? Keep it civil Samsara - what are you hiding from? I was just pointing out a strong inconsistency, if not a double standard in your voting - which needless to say is counter-productive to the FPC process. And commenting on this page as I frequently do, and having a nomination I have voted on in my watchlist is hardly "following you around". --Fir0002 07:45, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm talking about dispute resolution. Harrassment is not acceptable on Wikipedia. Please let me know if you feel that we need to enter dispute resolution right away. Otherwise please limit your behaviour to sensible and constructive comments, not just towards me, but also towards other users, or dispute resolution will be our only option. Regards, Samsara (talk • contribs) 09:07, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I have no dispute with you Samsara, and as far as I can tell from a quick look at WP:DR the dispute resolution process is mainly applied to article revert wars - hardly applicable here. What I do have is an issue with what I see as inconsistent voting (which I can only assume is sourced in some kind of personal bias) disrupting the FPC process. What were your motives behind supporting this nom despite clear over sharpening (later removed by uploader) and finding fault in this image for oversharpening? That is what I wish to be explained. Although this image may be approaching over sharpening it is no where near the levels of oversharpening in the Venessa nom. Duplicity isn't healthy for FPC and waving a dispute resolution is only muddying the waters... --Fir0002 10:02, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't think you understand. It is your behaviour that is at issue here. You have demonstrated in the past that you will dig through previous comments of mine and try to concoct some inconsistency in my voting to then justify an attack on my integrity. You are actually harassing me. Digging through previous comments is clear evidence of wikistalking, as is the fact that you have commented in this way repeatedly. Wikistalking needs to be dealt with. It is surprising that you attack me in this way and demand explanations when I am one of the editors who have gone furthest in writing down the criteria they use to judge pictures, and tried to collaborate with others to develop clearer guidelines than currently exist. It is you who simply cannot accept my opinion as valid. I was really hoping that you would be able to understand what you are doing, and refrain from it in future. Yours in hope, Samsara noadmin (talk) 11:01, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

You know that kind of archiving looks really bad - it just serves to strengthen the perception that you don't have a reason for your inconsistent voting. In which case I would request that in the interests of fair and useful evaluation of images on the FPC page you try not to do this in the future. Regards, --Fir0002 01:50, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * And your message really looks like you are insisting on picking a fight. Anyone is allowed to "vote" for anything for any reason. It is up to the closer to decide which "votes" to take into consideration based on the reasoning. Some things about pictures are subjective and there are going to be differences of opinions, this is life. Since you are not the policeman of anyone's brain but your own, I suggest you let it go. pschemp | talk 02:50, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

In the comment above, pschemp was replying to Fir, not to me. Samsara (talk • contribs) 07:51, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Template:Dmoz
Hello. I see your vote at the Templates_for_deletion/Log/2006_December_15. I agree with you.

Best regards, nejron (talk) 12:48, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

secret museum
I suppose I should not have used rollback. I was aware of the problem, but you had not solved it, had you? Johnbod (talk) 18:15, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * It was not solvable in the time I had available, and I believe my edit summary clearly indicated what the problem was. Reverting to another broken state was not a sensible course of action. Samsara (talk • contribs) 18:17, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Of course it was. Now the article has a working picture again. Johnbod (talk) 19:31, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Chester cathedral
Thanks for your feedback at the FPC. This is (so far) an unedited shot saved to jpg from the original nef file with maximal quality vs filesize. I've checked the original and it also has 'grain' in the sky - I think this is from the 800 ISO I was using (I shot it hand held). I can return with tripod for a lower ISO speed and maybe a little earlier to get a better balance. In the meantime I'll see what improvements can be made with photoshop - any idea what can be done with the sky? Regards --Joopercoopers (talk) 00:57, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

CSDWarnBot
Unfortunately, that's what the bot is designed to do - place warnings on the talk pages of users who created stuff up for speedy deletion if the taggers forget/neglect/elect not to. That includes my disposal of image description pages whose entire contents (being ) aren't applicable anymore. There's zilch I can do about the bot (except apply for adminship, which isn't a pleasant experience).

In short, don't place fpc on Commons hosted images. MER-C 06:50, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Caligo eurilochus 3 Richard Bartz.jpg
P.S. sorry for the confusion re: CSDWarnBot. Though my point still stands: you could have avoided the whole saga by not placing fpc. MER-C 07:49, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Naples
I thought we were supposed to be getting on with writing articles (though not you apparently)? You continue to ignore the fact that the image worked fine for me (at thumb at least) before you got involved. You presumably went half-way into the problem, initially making things worse. Since my only experience of you has been joining your pal on the sidelines of the ludicrous FAC, and reverting referenced material, and since your edit summary gave no indication you were going to return and sort the problem out, I restored what seemed to be an ok picture. Pschemp reverted this with a screaming edit summary directing me to look at the image, which I did, and then restored it as it looked ok. I would take your comments about civility more seriously if they were clearly not one-sided. I am delighted you have now sorted the matter out, which I would certainly not know how to do, and see no point on discussing the matter further. Johnbod (talk) 17:27, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

bio star
Aw gee thanks... that Gomphus floccosus picture was wooking pwetty wonewy all on its own so I just had to flesh it out a bit....cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 21:03, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

FPC
Hi, can you make your crucial vote whether you support the original picture or the alternative ? You vote is very important to determine which picture will gain the FPC standard. Dengero (talk)
 * There's no rush. You still have another three days. MER-C 06:16, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

gf
Hi Debivort, I just noticed you invoking good faith in what I perceive to be a marginal case. W.r.t. good faith, and leaving aside the issue that it the corresponding Wikipedia namespace document was downgraded from policy to guideline for unrelated reasons, to keep this short, I'd recommend you take a look at Templates for deletion/Log/2006 December 22, which is just one case where it was established by community consensus that accusing the opposite side of incivility or bad faith (which I see as closely related, and I suspect others would as well) tends to polarise an issue and build walls that make it difficult to maintain a constructive discussion. Perhaps you'll reconsider your use of GF as an argument in the light of this.

Best regards,

Samsara (talk • contribs) 16:06, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, gee... I think assuming good faith is critical to collaborative efforts. Being accused of ignoring the criteria is rather insulting, or at the very minimum, presumptuous and unconstructive. As for your TfD link, I wasn't using boilerplate. I wrote the whole comment from scratch - and stick by it. Thanks for the note though. de Bivort 16:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Reflection
That's a bit beyond me I'm afraid, all I did was a bit of clone-stamp on diffuse setting to remove this linear reflection old image with reflection. Tim Vickers (talk) 20:36, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Samsara (talk • contribs) 20:42, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Southern elephant seal
Can we translate the info on the French aticle into English and transfer it over here? Bobisbob (talk) 03:25, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome
Thanks mate. I'm hoping that I can do some more work on here. Last year was very busy, and I spent most my holidays in the field so I had no internet access. I don't imagine this year will be any less busy, but I'll try to spend more of my spare time on here rather than wasting it on tv etc. --liquidGhoul (talk) 13:23, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Featured Picture comment
"Don't ever ask me for another favour if you're not going to bother to defend your own suggestion that I've thus championed."

You're joking, right? Don't tell me you've been on Wikipedia since '03 and you have no manners. Kitkatcrazy (talk) 16:11, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Asteracea poster 3.jpg
An alternative to my Asteracea poster was nominated, just in your honour... I have included a flower of Galactites tomentosa, of the Carduoideae subfamily. It was quite difficult to mask the flower and I'm a little clumsy with the editing software. What do you think? -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 01:10, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Gomphus floccosus on main page for another few hours....
Well, hopefully you'll see it before its gone but anyway....cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 06:17, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Human
An editor has nominated Human, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 02:01, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Concholepas concholepas
I saw that was member of wikproject Gastropods, would you like to take a look at the Concholepas concholepas article and se if you want to improve it? Dentren | T a l k 10:31, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject History of Science newsletter : Issue IV - May 2008
A new May 2008 issue of the WikiProject History of Science newsletter is hot off the virtual presses. Please feel free to make corrections or add news about any project-related content you've been working on. You're receiving this because you are a participant in the History of Science WikiProject. You may read the newsletter or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Yours in discourse--ragesoss (talk) 23:15, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Literotica
I have nominated Literotica, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Literotica. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? &mdash;Ashanda (talk) 15:09, 24 May 2008 (UTC)


 * It appears you only created a redirect at that name. I'll be notifying the actual article author too. Cheers! &mdash;Ashanda (talk) 15:43, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Happy Independence Day!
As you are a nice Wikipedian, I just wanted to wish you a happy Independence Day! And if you are not an American, then have a happy day and a wonderful weekend anyway! :) Your friend and colleague, -- Happy Independence Day!   Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 01:14, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

POTD notification
Hi Samsara,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Japanese Squirrel edit2.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on July 17, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-07-17.  howcheng  {chat} 23:51, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Also,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Heliconius erato Richard Bartz.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on July 19, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-07-19.  howcheng  {chat} 00:00, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

One more:

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Kutia kondh woman.JPG is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on August 5, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-08-05.  howcheng  {chat} 22:27, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Next:

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Caligo eurilochus 3 Richard Bartz.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on August 18, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-08-18.  howcheng  {chat} 23:21, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice
Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 23:05, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles: Rollcall
At WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, we recently did a purge of the members list, which your name was on. Please re-add your username as well as your area of expertise at our list of participants if you plan to stay active in this Wikiproject. Also, a discussion is going on regarding the standardization of taxonomy in lizard articles, located in this section. We'd like to have some more voices in this matter. Thanks everyone!  bibliomaniac 1  5  23:12, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Open Directory Project (DMOZ) Links
The DMOZ search template (Dmoz2) is being considered for deletion because it violates WP:ELNO #9. I'm sending you this notice because of your previous participation in the TfD discussion for the DMOZ category template. Anyone interested in discussing the fate of Open Directory Project (DMOZ) search links is invited to join the discussion at Templates for deletion. Thank you. Qazin (talk) 07:12, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject History of Science newsletter : Issue V - January 2009
It's here at long last! The January 2009 issue of the WikiProject History of Science newsletter is ready, with exciting news about Darwin Day 2009. Please feel free to make corrections or add news about any project-related content you've been working on. You're receiving this because you are a participant in the History of Science WikiProject. You may read the newsletter or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Yours in discourse --ragesoss (talk) 02:56, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Comparison of GIS software
I have nominated Comparison of GIS software, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Comparison of GIS software. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 20:28, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Comparison of GIS software
A tag has been placed on Comparison of GIS software requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lets drink Tea 20:40, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

A very large and widespread CopyVio problem
I want to alert all Project Gastropods staff to the fact that we currently have a very major CopyVio problem which compromises the integrity of the encyclopedia, and opens the door for legal action against Wikipedia. This problem is spread across a huge number of gastropod articles (approximately 800 to 1,000) and it also spills over into the other molluscan groups. I am asking ask everyone who is available to help out with this in whatever way they can, but please do so in an organized and unified fashion so we all know what is going on. It seems that all of the articles in the Category: Molluscs of New Zealand contain a great deal of text that is copied verbatim or almost verbatim from the 1979 book by Powell, New Zealand Mollusca. I have had no experience in dealing with a crisis of this magnitude. Any help that any of you can offer or suggest is more than welcome. Invertzoo (talk) 21:14, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Ballpointpentip lessnoise.jpg
File:Ballpointpentip lessnoise.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Ballpointpentip lessnoise.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 23:52, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

GA Review of "Natural selection"
As part of the GA review sweeps process (see:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force/Sweeps, a project devoted to re-reviewing Good Articles listed before August 26, 2007), the article Natural selection has been re-reviewed. I have placed the article on hold until sufficient citations can be added to the article. If an editor has not expressed interest in improving the article within seven days, the article will be delisted as a Good Article. -- ErgoSum • talk • trib  04:31, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

GA review of "Evolution of sexual reproduction"
As part of the GA review sweeps process (see:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force/Sweeps, a project devoted to re-reviewing Good Articles listed before August 26, 2007), the article Evolution of sexual reproduction has been re-reviewed. I have placed the article on hold until sufficient citations can be added to the article, this point of improvement is mandatory for GA-quality articles. Optional points of improvement include: prose quality, and the guidelines issued at the manual of style for section headings, which include brevity and lack of repetition. If an editor has not expressed interest in improving the article within seven days, the article will be delisted as a Good Article. The review can be found at Talk:Evolution of sexual reproduction/GA1. -- ErgoSum • talk • trib  04:32, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Aps
Template:Aps has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 15:46, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of LabPlot
I have nominated LabPlot, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/LabPlot. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  GB fan  talk 23:10, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of DoCon
I have nominated DoCon, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/DoCon. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Joe Chill (talk) 20:06, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Goldenergiftfrosch2cele4.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Goldenergiftfrosch2cele4.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Ja Ga  talk 22:01, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Merging Fictional turtles into Cultural depictions of turtles and tortoises
As a contributor to one of these articles, would you like to comment at the merge proposal? Vmenkov (talk) 03:00, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cite science
Template:Cite science has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:22, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

FAR of Frog
nominated Frog for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Dana boomer (talk) 12:44, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Macintosh Revival
Hello, ! You've listed yourself as an active member of WikiProject Macintosh, which is currently seeing very little activity. We are trying to revive the project and your help would be appreciated. To see who is active and who is not, we will be listing all active members under "status pending" in the project's participant list. Please move your name to either the "former members" section or "active" section. Hope to see you in the "active" column! For more information on how to help the project, visit the How to help section at our project page! &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 02:35, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Macintosh Role Call
Hello, ! You've listed yourself as an active member of WikiProject Macintosh, which is currently being revived. Your help would be appreciated! To see who is active and who is not, we will be listing all active members under "status pending" in the project's participant list. Please move your name to either the "former members" section or "active" section. The role call will end May 31; please move your name now if you are still interested. For more information on how to help the project, visit the How to help section at our project page! &middot MonoBot04:19, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Karte Bad Nenndorf in Deutschland.png
A tag has been placed on File:Karte Bad Nenndorf in Deutschland.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tim 1357  talk 19:48, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Färberfrosch Dendrobates tinctorius.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Färberfrosch Dendrobates tinctorius.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:15, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Linux For You
An article that you have been involved in editing, Linux For You, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ahunt (talk) 18:28, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:P ocularis USGS.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:P ocularis USGS.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 10:23, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

An image you were involved with at FPC has been nominated for delisting
Please be sure to comment if you like. -- I'ḏ ♥  One  20:45, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Notice - Featured portal review/Biology
Please see Featured portal review/Biology. -- Cirt (talk) 13:21, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Request input on PR for GNOME
Hello, I saw via page analysis that you are one of the top editors of the Ubuntu OS article. I recently submitted GNOME for PR and would greatly appreciate your input at Peer review/GNOME/archive2 or Talk:GNOME. Thanks! –Paul M. Nguyen (chat|blame) 02:51, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Istiophorus platypterus.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Istiophorus platypterus.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 10:04, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Istiophorus platypterus.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Istiophorus platypterus.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Magog the Ogre (talk) 17:31, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

welcome back - thought you might be interested in......
this --> Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Biology Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 23:12, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:FOSS personalities
Template:FOSS personalities has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:09, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mentor (statistics)


The article Mentor (statistics) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication of notability, proved with references to reliable sources, discussing the subject in-depth.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 10:14, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Antibiotic resistance.gif listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Antibiotic resistance.gif, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:39, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Undelete markup.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Undelete markup.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:53, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Requests for watching
Requests for watching, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for watching and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Requests for watching during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 08:27, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

GFDL
There is a discussion at Commons:Commons_talk:Featured_picture_candidates. Please participate. -- Jkadavoor (talk) 16:43, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Raining cats, dogs and kiwi
Copied back to Talk:Kiwi

Fixes made at FAC
Just so you know, fixes have been made relating to your comments at Featured article candidates/Strepsirrhini/archive1. Images have been cleaned up (to the best of my ability), I have attempted to copyedit the text, and I have requested clarification about the placement of one image. If you have a moment, I would appreciate your reply. Best. – Maky  « talk » 02:01, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Pentax X-5
The DYK project (nominate) 08:08, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Camera classes
Any order does not mean a degradiation. Please see that the Nikon D5200 is in the same line as the D4. Pentax can be made the same style, if overview is acceptable. Tagremover (talk) 12:07, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Under "Cameras that support time-lapse still image capture with a built-in intervalometer", you've differented Nikon's DSLRs by product line and listed the MILCs separately; however, for Pentax, you've lumped a MILC, a flagship DSLR, and an entry level DSLR. Under "Cameras that support automatic and autonomous time-lapse video creation", you have gone as far as to lump a bridge camera, a MILC and a DSLR for Pentax. There is no way that this is acceptable under WP:NPOV. Samsara (FA • FP) 12:15, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I can't see the problem. You are a proud Pentax user? Tagremover (talk) 12:21, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm beginnig to wonder if you understand anything I've said so far. Can you confirm for me that you understand the difference between a MILC and a bridge camera, and that you understand that the Nikon 1 series as well as the Pentax Q and K-01 are MILC cameras, while the X-5 is a bridge camera and the K-5 a flagship DSLR, with the K-30 an entry level DSLR? Do you understand that these are different classes of product? Do you understand that when you make a distinction between different classes of DSLR for Nikon, you must also do so for Pentax in order to avoid bias? Samsara (FA • FP) 12:26, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Can you please say anything to my already given arguments in the comments? D4=D5200? Tagremover (talk) 12:30, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't see why I should answer your questions if you don't answer mine. My talkpage is not your personal soap box. If you want to engage in discussion, engage in discussion.
 * Now, I'll pay you this unreturned courtesy just once: What you are putting forward is a strawman concession. You are not being consistent across the two sections, and you've provided no replies to the points I've raised. This is not about reaching some kind of compromise between us, this is about satisfying NPOV, and right now, your editing is failing on that. Samsara (FA • FP) 12:38, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Peer Review of Flying Spaghetti Monster
Hi! I have listed Flying Spaghetti Monster for peer review at Peer review/Flying Spaghetti Monster/archive1. any input on how to improve the article would be very much appreciated. Thanks! --

Amphibian FAC
You made some comments on the Amphibian FAC page and I, you and others have tried to address the issues you raised. This FAC has now been nominated for just over a month and although several people have supported its candidacy, nobody has actually opposed it. Your comments voiced the most criticism of the article and I think its final success is not assured. When one has put a lot of effort into an article, it would be disappointing if it were to fail at the final hurdle. Do you have any more matters that you consider need attention? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:16, 7 December 2012 (UTC)