User talk:Samsedea987

Speedy deletion nomination of The Madam of Cranleigh
Hello Samsedea987,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Madam of Cranleigh for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Anastasia (talk) 21:10, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Madam of Cranleigh


The article The Madam of Cranleigh has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no source supplied, none found, fails WP:V; see talk page. Additions about "Carlosa Amadeous" are linked to an undoubted hoax at User:Michella rapitueno, but the original "urban legend" version is also unsourced and unverifiable. From the spelling, this is kids messing about.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JohnCD (talk) 09:05, 22 June 2013 (UTC)