User talk:Samson22911

Who is "we"?
You say on your user page, " we hope to update the section on Pio Pico"; who is "we"? -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  19:47, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Dear Orangemike, Thanks so much for taking the time to write as I am new to this Wiki process with the first edit here in the Pio Pico section. My daughter and I are the "we" as we have co-authored this peer-reviewed scholarly medical article published about Pio Pico which is the basis for the Wiki edit on this topic. With your great experience I welcome any and all suggestions on how to improve what we have done. I am the registered contributor but "we" collaborate on the content.--Samson22911 (talk) 19:58, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Fixing references in Pio Pico
In case you didn't see it, you have received some replies to your question on the New Contributors' Help Page here. If you need further hep, please ask on my talk page. --Thomprod (talk) 20:12, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Your message on my talk page
Thanks for the message, glad I could help. There is no way to create a private sandbox - one of the principles of Wikipedia is that all edits are open etc. If the edits that you plan to make to existing articles are non-controversial and supported by reliable sources, there is no need to put them in a sandbox first, just be bold and edit the article. If they are potentially controversial edits, you should discuss them on the article's talk page first and gain consensus. If you are planning to create a new article, it is a good idea, especially if you are a new user, to create it in a sandbox/subpage first. You can create as many subpages as you need - the easiest way is to add a link to the subpage that you need to your user page, something like User:Samson22911/nameofarticlehere. As the page does not yet exist it will be a redlink, so if you click on it, the page will open in edit mode and you can begin writing. It's always a good idea to add the user sandbox template at the top so that other editors know it is a sandbox/subpage. Hope this helps, let me know if I can help further. – ukexpat (talk) 03:08, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Pio Pico
Samson, your message is still on the talk page (it is at the bottom) - I just re-arranged the messages so that they are in chronological sequence so that other editors can follow them. The usual standard for talk pages (likre this talk page) is that the latest edit is at the end (bottom). As far as changing it goes - I don't know if you are right, but you have provided your reason, you have made a comment on the talk page - so I would go ahead and make that change in the text.Emargie (talk) 15:14, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Pio Pico wrong date
Dear Emargie, thanks for your insights. I did change the date in the caption of the photograph but I found that the description of the photo in the wiki commons section has a date of the photo listed as 1848 which is incorrect. If you go to the original url site for this photo there is NO place where the date of 1848 is listed as the correct date. In fact, there is no date listed at all, only that strange phrase, "...in the style of 1848..." As I wrote earlier, the image itself has the date of 1858. Is there a way to change the incorrect date of 1848 in the reference that someone placed in association with the image?Samson22911 (talk) 15:39, 22 June 2010 (UTC)