User talk:Samtaliuw/Aston Martin in Formula One

Hey, I'm glad to see that you've got started making improvements to your article. It seems like you've expanded the lead with a summary of the history of the 1960 team and more description of how the team is being reintroduced today. I think these changes will really improve the article. It also seems like you've added a few new sources to the article. Nice!

I just want to reiterate some of the feedback I left on your article evaluation: The article you're working on is wp:c-class, which means that it's pretty well developed but might be missing information and would benefit from polish and organization. So far you've worked on improving the lead, but I'd also like to see you add new content and maybe reorganize or revise some of the content that's already there. I think the work you did to revise the lead was was pretty good and you could do something similar with one or more of the other sections.

On my feedback on your article evaluation I also suggested looking to other, more developed, articles on F1 teams or other sports teams for inspiration. I think this could be particularly useful for coming up with improvements to the organization of the article.

Overall, nice work so far. I'm so excited to see how you develop this article! Groceryheist (talk) 04:23, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

peer review
Hi! I just did my peer review for your article! 11boba (talk) 07:56, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Comment on Peer Review
Greetings, {U|11boba}} has left you a super encouraging peer review (User:Samtaliuw/Aston_Martin_in_Formula_One/11boba_Peer_Review link). I have a lot of positive things to say about your efforts on the article. I noticed that you have been gradually incorporating your changes into the live, mainspace version of the article. This isn't what I expected, but so far it's going well. Maybe you saw that other Wikipedians have been working on this article recently so it makes sense to incorporate your changes as you go so you can avoid an awkard merging step. It looks like the other editors have accepted your contributions as indicated by their minor edits to copyedit your additions and organize your references. Don't worry about this. I think it's going fine so continue making incremental changes directly to the article. It is not hard for me to keep track of your contributions. Nice work so far!

At this stage, I still hope you'll find a bit more new information to add to the article. Maybe you can find this information be mining the existing sources. See this how-to guide for advice and instructions about how to mine sources for information.

I also think you're ready to work on polishing your article. The article you're working on is wp:c-class, so it's already undergone a good amount of polishing, with developed infoboxes and categories, but there's still some room to improve. Overall, I suggest you take a look at my page on polishing your article for ideas for your next round of work on this project. I especially think that doing things like adding wikilinks, "also see" links, categories, and external links are good things to do when polishing an article. I also suggest that you spend some time carefully copyediting the information you've already added to make it as easy to read as possible while maintaining an wp:encyclopedic tone.

I'll take a look at any new contributions you make next week. Good job so far and I'm excited to see how else you'll be able to improve the article.

Groceryheist (talk) 18:05, 4 February 2021 (UTC)