User talk:Samtaliuw/Evaluate an Article

Hi, here's my feedback on your article evaluation.

Although it seems clear this article has some room to improve, I'm not 100% it's an ideal choice for the class project. My concern is mainly that the article on Aston Martin in Formula One is already pretty well developed as a c-class article. As you pointed out, the lead of the article is on the shorter side and there's room to improve the writing style. However, I'm not 100% sure that you'll be able to find a enough new information to add to the article for 2-3 new paragraphs. It looks like you've got a good start finding sources, but haven't yet started writing new sections of the article. I strongly encourage you to make progress on that as soon as you can to make sure that you'll be able to add enough new content to the article. I hope that you'll do more than just update the lead. Adding more content on the 2 years that Aston Martin spent in F1 sounds like a promising direction. I also suggest that you might look to articles on similar topics (F1 teams or other sports teams) for inspiration about what kinds of sections the article might have or types of information to include. I'm a little bit worried it might be hard to develop this article much further (it can sometimes be more difficult to improve an article beyond C-class). The choice of whether to stick with this article for the project or to choose a new one is totally up to you, but if you have a hard time finding sources it will make completing the project difficult. The other idea you had (the Alpine F1 team) might be promising since the article is less well developed but I'm not sure about that. It seems like the team is new and so there might not be as much information published about it.

Good luck! Please ping me when you've drafted 2-3 paragraphs of changes to the article. Groceryheist (talk) 22:30, 24 January 2021 (UTC)