User talk:Samuel Blanning

Signpost updated for April 7th and 14th, 2008.
Sorry, it seems that the bot quit before completing its run last week. Here is the last two weeks' worth of Signpost. Ralbot (talk) 09:06, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:06, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Msscandalous.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Msscandalous.JPG. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 12:26, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Album swami desirock.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Album swami desirock.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --20:26, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Album_swami_desirock.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Album_swami_desirock.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 21:00, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

I need graphics editing help
I noticed you are listed to help people in designing their user pages.

Well, I need help with a similar type of thing - graphics editing.

I'm preparing to coordinate this: and for it I'm developing some awards. Each award will include an image, and that's where I need help...

I've got to have all the awards done by July 15th, and I don't even have the first one finished yet.

I'm looking for someone who knows how (or is interested in jumping in and learning how) to work on images in xcf format using GIMP, or Inkscape, etc. (Because I and others will need to be able to edit each image's layers after you are done with it).

If this sounds like something you are interested in helping with, please drop me a note.

By the way, both GIMP and Inkscape are free, making it easy to get started from scratch.

I look forward to your reply.

The Transhumanist 12:44, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Spamblock
Template:Spamblock has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 06:45, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films August 2008 Newsletter
The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:13, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Cambridge meetup!
Hi Samuel, this is just to let you know of a proposed Cambridge meetup - suggested dates currently Saturday 18 October or Sunday 19th October. If you're interested, please give an idea of which day might be best for you there - & if you know of anyone else who might like to attend do let them know! Cheers, Dsp13 (talk) 14:21, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Deletion review for PAGE_NAME
An editor has asked for a deletion review of PAGE_NAME. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedy-deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. ' FL a  RN ' (talk)  04:38, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Firstnewslogo.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Firstnewslogo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:02, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Review for Kevla Corporation
Could you please look into the artilce Kevla Corporation, the final clear version is at; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Linkaland/Kevla_Corporation

The article is neutral and non advertising. It was the starting point for my series of articles about the IT sector in Reston Virginia. But the first one got shot down from the start. I fixed it but no one bothered to look.

thanks (Linkaland (talk) 05:05, 19 February 2009 (UTC))

Your Attention is requested
You have made very constructive comments regarding 'banning' process. Your kind attention is requested (here). If needed incidents will be quoted where ethics are violated. Thanks. 75.55.49.63 (talk) 08:09, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Admin Coaching
I saw that you were listed in the Coaches for reconfirmation section of the admin coaching status page. Could you please update your status, and if you are still interested, drop me a note on my talk page? Thanks,  Genius  101 Guestbook  14:27, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Werbistdu.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Werbistdu.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Peripitus (Talk) 12:39, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Malamaalweeklyscreen.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Malamaalweeklyscreen.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Task force roll call notice
Hello! Your username is listed on the Indian cinema task force participants list, but your user contributions show no activity within the past 18 months. Consequently, we've taken your name off of the list. If you still consider yourself an active editor of the task force, we encourage you to please add your name back to the Active Members list. Thanks! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 22:51, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Evereve1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Evereve1.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 72.88.101.36 (talk) 03:02, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

sent you an email, please respond at earliest convenience -Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Atomicnomad (talk • contribs) 06:33, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Most Wanted (Hunterz album)


The article Most Wanted (Hunterz album) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * fails WP:NALBUMS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hekerui (talk) 19:58, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Phat Trax Vol. 1: Blazin


The article Phat Trax Vol. 1: Blazin has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * fails WP:NALBUMS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hekerui (talk) 19:58, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Sockpuppeteerproven
A tag has been placed on Template:Sockpuppeteerproven requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. Doug.(talk • contribs) 06:09, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sockpuppeteerproven
Template:Sockpuppeteerproven has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Avi (talk) 00:34, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

from Abraham Alvarez Valls
Hi. as you know I´m Abraham from Cuba. So I´m interesting about making friends to share points of views, opinion, among others. i´m a medical student. So if you can write me back to my e-mail and become in my first friend on Internet —Preceding unsigned comment added by AAValls (talk • contribs) 16:06, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi Samuel! I've noticed that Jordan Maxwell's wiki has been deleted again. They say the author requested for it to be deleted, which I don't know if we can trust, because it had been deleted by several I cannot figure out how to restore it if it's at all possible. As you've doen it before I'd like to ask you to restore it again if possible. Thanks, Andre —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.105.65.39 (talk) 17:30, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Admin Coaching: Reconfirmation
I was looking through the coaches at Admin_coaching/Status and saw that there are a lot under "reconfirmation".

Could you let me know if you are still interesting in being involved with Admin Coaching, or if you would prefer to have your name removed from the "reconfirmation" list. If you want to be involved, could you please move your entry from "Reconfirmation" to "Active" and indicate how many students you would be willing to have (obviously, if you are actively coaching at the moment, then please indicate this!)

If I do not hear from you within a week, I will assume that you would like to have your name removed from the list of coaches.

And yes, I noticed that you are semi-retired from Wikipedia, but I thought I'd ask anyway!

Regards, --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 07:22, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Auchwaricheingauner.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Auchwaricheingauner.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:49, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Hidden archive top
Template:Hidden archive top has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Triona (talk) 09:43, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:GrandMonsterSlamScreenshot.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:GrandMonsterSlamScreenshot.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:45, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Auchwaricheingauner.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Auchwaricheingauner.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:26, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Firstnewscover.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Firstnewscover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:56, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Elmarbrandt.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Elmarbrandt.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:07, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Biased editing of Technological Utopianism by Loremaster.
Biased editing of Technological Utopianism by Loremaster.

Due to your past contribution to Technological utopianism, you may currently want to help editing the Technological utopianism article because currently only one editor is contributing to the article. The Singularitarianism Article could also benefit from your help.

I feel Loremaster is editing Singularitarianism and Technological utopianism in a biased manner in accordance with his Save The Earth propaganda. Loremasters's ideology seems to verge towards Neo-Luddism. Here are the damming facts Loremaster has stated in discussion:


 * Loremaster says he is:


 * Loremaster wants people to:


 * Loremaster sees his editing as a 'fight' and he states:

81.151.135.248 (talk) 12:12, 18 December 2010 (UTC)JB

--Loremaster (talk) 00:47, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * LOL
 * 1) Despite the fact that I openly admit to being a technorealist who is critical of techno-utopianism in all its forms, I have let never this point of view influence any of my edits or reverts of the Technological utopianism or Singularitarianism articles. On the contrary, I am the person most responsible for expanding the former article with content some would argue is “pro-techno-utopian” (i.e. passages from James Hughes' book Citizen Cyborg).
 * 2) I find it disgusting that 81.151.135.248 would take comments I made out of context to falsely make it seem I see my editing of any article as part of my fight for the environment.
 * 3) In light of this outrageous act of bad faith, I will do everything in my power to get this jerk banned from Wikipedia.

File:Paul_clarkin.jpg
I have tagged File:Paul_clarkin.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. Closedmouth (talk) 10:07, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Suspension of admin privileges due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 22:18, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Imwahlkampfvormir.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Imwahlkampfvormir.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:35, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

List of publications in law
Hi,

I'm asking you to restore List of publications in law so I can move it to List of important publications in law as sources can be found for such a topic:


 * 
 * 

are examples. ThanksCurb Chain (talk) 06:19, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Deletion review for List of publications in law
An editor has asked for a deletion review of List of publications in law. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Curb Chain (talk) 06:27, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Scyphomedusae_Chrysaora_melanaster.jpg
Hi, you uploaded but the copyright status may be in doubt.

You claimed that it was public domain, apparently because it was on an NOAA web site, but do you have evidence that picture was taken by the NOAA? The reason I ask is that this site has a copy of what is clearly the same image, albeit in higher resolution: Chrysaora_melanaster-2-800x600.jpg. At that site, however, it is credited to "Raskoff/MPC", presumably Kevin Raskoff of the Monterey Peninsula College, and is listed as free for educational use only. This seems to indicate that the image may not be by the NOAA.

Any clarification you could provide on the image source would be helpful.

— Steven G. Johnson (talk) 20:03, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Steuersong.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Steuersong.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:33, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Scene from Road to Guantanamo.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Scene from Road to Guantanamo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:40, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Notice of change
Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that you will not longer be able to request restoration of the tools because of your prior inactivity. You have until December 30, 2012 to request restoration or else the policy will prevent you from doing so in the future; you would need to seek a new WP:RFA. Until December 30, you can file a request at WP:BN for review by the crats. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 04:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

(delivered by mabdul 23:47, 3 December 2012 (UTC))

Samantha Findlay
You were the deleting admin on the Samantha Findlay article in 2006. At that time, Findlay had completed her freshman year, and the AfD debate was based on her limited contributions as a college player in her freshman year. Her career progressed substantially thereafter, including (i) being named an All-American in 2008, (ii) setting several career hitting records at Michigan, (iii) being the subject of numerous articles in mainstream media, (iv) playing professional softball for four years, and (v) becoming a coach at DePaul. She now seems to pretty clearly pass WP:GNG. Nevertheless, if you have any concerns with this article being re-created, please let me know. Cbl62 (talk) 22:45, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Discussion of interest
As a major contributor, you may be interested in Talk:Sanssouci. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:23, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Featured Article Review for Sanssouci
I have nominated Sanssouci for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:15, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:XY 400.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:XY 400.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:32, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Blocked sockpuppet
Template:Blocked sockpuppet has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gparyani (talk) 05:27, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Karunamon/myg0t
User:Karunamon/myg0t, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Karunamon/myg0t and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Karunamon/myg0t during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. —/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 01:48, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Perzonal War


The article Perzonal War has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Seemingly hardly much for a better article as well as notability with my searches also only finding a few passing mentions.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SwisterTwister  talk  08:43, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Samuel Blanning/DYK
User:Samuel Blanning/DYK, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Samuel Blanning/DYK and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Samuel Blanning/DYK during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:04, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

As you're listed at WP:MIA
 Removal from member list You have been inactive for more than 6 months and have been removed from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee birthday list. If you become active again please feel free to re-add yourself.

Best wishes, Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 02:10, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Collapse bottom
Template:Collapse bottom has been nominated for merging with Template:Hidden archive bottom. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 03:10, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Awarapaagaldeewanadvd.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Awarapaagaldeewanadvd.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

come back
Please come back!! Cool guy (talk • contribs) • he/they 03:38, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Romani ite domum for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Romani ite domum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Romani ite domum until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. —  Fourthords  &#124; =Λ= &#124; 15:00, 13 March 2023 (UTC)