User talk:Samuel Wiki

Alpha and omega 2
Their will be a alpha and omega 2 and many websites including wiki help said their will be one. Even entertainment weekly said their will be one. Look at talk in the article of alpha and omega. It said there will be a possible sequel. And simple English Wikipedia said. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rodj123 (talk • contribs) 22:26, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * One of Wikipedia's core policies is Verifiability. This means that whenever something contentious or possibly contentious is added to Wikipedia, a reliable source must be provided. Some examples of reliable sources include books, newspapers, magazines and websites written by people of some authority (eg. professional journalists). This policy ensures that the information on Wikipedia is accurate. Wikipedia does not deal in rumors. The Wikipedia Talk page and the Simple English Wikipedia do not count as reliable sources that can be used to source information on Wikipedia (you cannot use Wikipedia as a source on Wikipedia). The Entertainment Weekly article would be considered a reliable source, except that it is no longer available. My guess is that it proved to be untrue and was taken down, if it even existed. If it was true, the news would have been rereported by other publications. I have not been able to find a single reliable source that says an Alpha and Omega sequel is in development or production. If it was in development or production, the studio would have announced it and there would definitely be multiple sources reporting about it. Face it, an Alpha and Omega sequel is not in production. It is only until a reliable source that says otherwise is found that the information can be added to the article. - Kollision (talk) 06:02, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Academy awards nominations
This time of year, that page is one of the top searched items on google. Having that page as a title (academy awards nominations) raises the wikipedia rank on the google search, it also provides the information that most readers are looking for. They want to see what the nominations are, and if they so chose they can click on the main article for more information. There is currently no page that offers readers a simple and accurate list of nominations without adds or lots of other information the user is not interested in reading. By having a page like this, readers have the info they want, links to articles on the movies, directors, this years academy awards and the history of the awards all in once place. I have watched the search rank of this page go higher and higher per day and I checked the stats and the amount of people accessing this page began at a rank of 500 hits a day and grew, which for me at least, shows that many readers, as I've said, would like to have a simple and accurate page with nominations and links to other articles if they so chose to click on them. I hope I've made sense here. --Shabidoo | Talk 00:26, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
 * There was also some (admittedly small) amount of extra information in the introduction and in the infobox. --Shabidoo | Talk 00:33, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
 * 85th Academy Awards Nominations 2013 now redirects to 85th Academy Awards, which contains all the nominations. Having two articles with the same information was pointless and we usually don't branch off into smaller articles unless the main article gets too long, which is not the case here. The article title has no bearing on this, people will not have any problems finding this list. All that Google stuff has no bearing on this either; we do not change the way we do things just because it may result in a higher rank on Google. If someone clicks the link to '85th Academy Awards Nominations 2013' on Google they will be redirected to '85th Academy Awards'. In time, the link to '85th Academy Awards Nominations 2013' will probably be removed from Google and the rank for '85th Academy Awards' will also go up. - Kollision (talk) 04:55, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes...when you put it that way, that does make sense. --Shabidoo | Talk 07:02, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Film
Regarding the discussion about coordinators at WT:FILM, I set up a long time ago the agenda you linked to. These were my own ideas, and they may have been proposed in too much of a top-down fashion. Discussions at WT:FILMC were never very fulfilling, so I've grown cynical about the notion of collaboration, both formal and informal. Thankfully we have a healthy general talk page that can resolve disputes and build consensus on a case-by-case basis. It may be that WikiProject Film has too much structure (especially with the unused task forces) and we need to get back to basics, such as empowering editors with their own tools. (My recent "Recommended pages" posting is one attempt at that.) In the past, I talked to about having a bot that could address the more tedious editing tasks, but that never got finalized. If you have suggestions about what to do with WikiProject Film and whether or not it involves coordinators, I'm happy to hear you out. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 17:17, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Re: alpha and omega 2
If you type in alpha and omega in google look at the right and it says in there"sequel: Alpha And Omega 2" but it's unchangeable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rodj123 (talk • contribs) 17:27, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * That is still not a reliable source. The Knowledge Graph pulls information from a variety of sources including Wikipedia itself. It is actually quite likely that Google's "Alpha and Omega 2" information was retrieved from when the information was still in the Alpha and Omega Wikipedia article and it has taken some time for the update to flow through. - Kollision (talk) 03:56, 10 February 2013 (UTC)


 * I don't think it got the sequel info from Wikipedia and also look at alpha and omega's Facebook page and it says would you like to see an alpha and omega 2 and over 1500 people said yes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rodj123 (talk • contribs) 22:12, 1 April 2013 (UTC)


 * That doesn't mean anything; "Would you like to see an Alpha and Omega 2?" is not the same as "Alpha and Omega 2 is in development." Like I said before, until a reliable source confirms Alpha and Omega 2 is in development, it isn't happening. - Kollision (talk) 05:33, 2 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Surprise. I saw a shooting star and said to have alpha and omega 2 be a movie And now there is a alpha and omega series and the first of the series is alpha and omega 2: A howl-iday adventure. Shooting stars do make wishes real.Rodj123 (talk) 14:40, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Article Feedback deployment
Hey Kollision; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:06, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

3 movie contract for lionsgate and crest animation.
They had a 3 movie contract and they only did 1 then the upcoming on would be norm of the north but what's the 3rd? Would it be alpha and omega 2? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rodj123 (talk • contribs) 15:26, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The third film has not yet been announced. Whether it will be or won't be Alpha and Omega 2 is a matter of speculation. Wikipedia deals with verifiable facts, not rumors or speculation. - Kollision (talk) 16:01, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Mia Frye
Hi, I have made an article about an actress called Mia Frye she appeared in the Nikita film that you have edited. If you know french and can update her article please do. Regards,--BabbaQ (talk) 20:33, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

February 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=596448054 your edit] to Bruce Weber (photographer) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:40, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

An RfC that you may be interested in...
As one of the previous contributors to Infobox film or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!
 * This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (t • e • c) 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Vimeo
Saw that you made the last modification to the template, might you be able to add support for album ?
 * For example


 * https://vimeo.com/album/2805910 Fuzz testing
 *  WurmWoode  T   22:10, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=606878550 your edit] to Hypermetabolism may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:59, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
 * signals an underlying issue, it is one of the body’s strongest defenses against illness and injury.

Percy Jackson Task-force
Hi, I'm looking to help re-activate the Percy Jackson Task-force. As you are one of the few "inactive" or "unknown" members still actively editing Wikipedia, I wanted to extend an invitation for you to work with me to do this. If you are no longer interested, I'd appreciate your taking the time to move your username to the "inactive" list here or removing it altogether. And thanks for all you did before!

If you are interested, firstly I'd like to invite you to become a full member, as the requirements for membership are going to be lowered in the near future (I know they scared me away on the first try) -- or just a "supporter", if that's more your speed. I would also ask you to consider a proposal I have, which is that this task-force become the "Rick Riordan" task-force. I've suggested this because I think it would help keep the project active and also help stop some pretty widespread vandalism in articles referring to that author. My proposal in brief. I'm a relatively new Wikipedian, so I'd appreciate the advice and expertise of a more experienced user. Thanks again in advance, and feel free to contact me on my Talk page. 2ReinreB2 (talk) 02:33, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

WP:PJTF checkback
Hi, Kollision, just checking up on your July invitation to rejoin the Percy Jackson Task-force. Please do not feel pressured in any way to decide, but be aware that your username has been moved to the "Inactive" section of our members list, should you ever go looking for it. Thanks again for your past work, and happy editing! -- 2ReinreB2 (talk) 02:02, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Federation Centres logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Federation Centres logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:50, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jarrad Seng, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2015 Nepal earthquake. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Jarrad Seng
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Walking on a Dream cover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Walking on a Dream cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:24, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Your inactive bot(s)
Hello Samuel Wiki. We currently show that you are the operator on file for at least one  account that appears to be inactive. Please see the discussion and list of bots here: Bot owners' noticeboard. If you are no longer operating your bot, no action is required - your bot will be marked as retired and have the bot flag removed. Should your bot be retired and you wish to revive it in the future, please request bot authorization at WP:BRFA. If you are still in control of your bot (including knowing its hopefully strong password) and wish to maintain the bot flag, please sign the table on the linked discussion. Thank you, — xaosflux  Talk 14:40, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Discussion
Started a discussion Talk:Ibuprofen_brand_names Best Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 23:15, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Philosophy of Ghost in the Shell for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Philosophy of Ghost in the Shell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Philosophy of Ghost in the Shell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  20:26, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message
--UTRSBot (talk) 03:00, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Perth, western australia
You appear to be a Perth, western australia resident - are you interested at all in meeting up with fellow editors/photographers?

If so please note -https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Meetup/Perth/45

No harm if you are not interested, but just alerting you to the option of meeting real live editors... JarrahTree 05:56, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Windan Bridge
Hi Samuel Wiki. I see that you recently created a redirect to Goongoongup Bridge. These structures were built about 5 years apart and although adjacent, are quite separate things. I'd prefer that this remain as a redlink which may encourage someone to actually develop an article. A redirect won't do that. Moondyne (talk) 06:44, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ Moondyne (talk) 04:58, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I am aware they are separate structures but I felt it was better for the reader to be redirected to some information than to get no information. Anyway, I created the article for Windan Bridge now. - Samuel Wiki (talk) 05:51, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks, looks great. Moondyne (talk) 03:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Neutral notice
A move request regarding Deadline.com / Deadline Hollywood, an article you have edited, is taking place at Talk:Deadline Hollywood. It is scheduled to end in seven days.--Tenebrae (talk) 19:18, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

List of YouTubers
There is another deletion discussion on List of YouTubers. If you would like to weigh in, you can do so by checking out the discussion here. Mr. C.C. Hey yo!I didn't do it! 05:59, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

you appear
to not wish to identify your location - but notice that you edit items -

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Meetup/Perth/50

just in case you are interested  JarrahTree 12:29, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Meetups #87, #88, #89, #90
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:33, 19 July 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

very interested
If you were local and interested in any way meeting with local editors at all ? JarrahTree 05:19, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, I am local. I did meet you guys once way back in 2011. But I'm happy carrying on doing my own thing at the moment. - Samuel Wiki (talk) 05:58, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
 * That's fine - if or whenever you are interested - it's mainly a quite different mob and context now as well JarrahTree 22:51, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

thanks
for your contributions to west oz material - and have a good new year as well maybe we'll get you out of your here/not here mode and actually to a wikipedia meetup in the new year some time :) (things change in 7 years) JarrahTree 01:37, 27 December 2018 (UTC)


 * better images maybe - it all depends, replacing images in articles could be a matter of perspective - would be better (sic) if you could be a little more neutral when you replace images, at least in the edit summaries - more representative of the subject of the article - some images can be crap, and even fail quality wise, but actually involve better  the context or the sense of the subject... always better to let others judge that... just a thought... JarrahTree 11:56, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Also, if you're interested in finding out whats missing images on Wikidata, WikiShootMe (documentation) is quite good for that. - Evad37 &#91;talk] 08:07, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:South Park production comparison.png
Thanks for uploading File:South Park production comparison.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:39, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:South Park production comparison.png
Thanks for uploading File:South Park production comparison.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:46, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:South Park production comparison.png
Thanks for uploading File:South Park production comparison.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Women in Red April Events
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:33, 22 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

good afternoon
Hi. A topic about internet censorship in iran needs to become update on Wikipedia. Please add "How Iranian people access to block websites and use social medias" Wikipedia needs your attention to become better place. Thank you. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship_in_Iran Omid6578 (talk) 14:14, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

happy christmas/new year
make sure to avoid the multanovas, and despite your diffidence - hope we see you sometime in 2020! thanks for your contributions to the west australian items JarrahTree 08:14, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:HBF Health Fund (logo).png
Thanks for uploading File:HBF Health Fund (logo).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Join the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!
Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Proposed deletion of World of Ghost in the Shell


The article World of Ghost in the Shell has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unnecessary plot split that fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTPLOT. While there is analysis on the series' themes, it's not really relevant to the fictional world as its own topic. That's better left to an analysis section in the main article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 15:03, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Special:WantedTemplates
Hi, I have been helping with an effort to clear up false-positives in Special:WantedTemplates and found that 10 of the entries can be traced back to User:Samuel Wiki/monobook.js/script.js. For example, if you check Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Start date\, you will see that the server is reporting that User:Samuel Wiki/monobook.js/script.js is transcluding that template. Clearly this is a quirk in how the backend software parses javascript pages, but it makes it harder to find the real problem pages. It would be great if you could put // at the bottom of the script page. Since these are commented out, it won't break the javascript, but it will prevent the backend software from parsing the  as a template transclusion. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 22:16, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Changes needed to update Skillsoft page
There have been a few changes with Skillsoft, so some of the information needs to be updated: they are now a public company, they've merged with Global Knowledge, and their leadership team has gone through some changes also.

Skillsoft Public Relations (talk) 13:42, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

OTR
Thanks for splitting out OTR (convenience store) from On the Run (convenience store), I have been thinking of doing that the past week but was putting it off, so glad to see someone like you have done it first. I will also add in a photo that I took last week that was intended for the stand-alone OTR article.  Marc nut 1996  (talk) 00:10, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
 * All good! Samuel Wiki (talk) 00:31, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on List of Lego films and TV series
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of Lego films and TV series, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Qwerfjkl_(bot)&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:05, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Lego_films_and_TV_series&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1154902441%7CList%20of%20Lego%20films%20and%20TV%20series%5D%5D Ask for help])

Orphaned non-free image File:Tattarang logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Tattarang logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax «¦talk¦» 03:07, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

any thoughts?

 * - not sure where that fits (or not) JarrahTree 09:44, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
 * @JarrahTree I haven't read anything about a liquidation or anything around that time. I would leave it out until you get a clearer picture of what happened. -Samuel Wiki (talk) 10:06, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
 * thanks for answering, I find the item weird, and not touching it. JarrahTree 10:11, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Gorillaz - Clint Eastwood (sample).ogg


The file File:Gorillaz - Clint Eastwood (sample).ogg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not an improvement to understanding Clint Eastwood (song) or Gorillaz. Not proven that omitting the file would detriment such understanding either. In other words, not contextually significant to either topic in question."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. George Ho (talk) 19:57, 25 March 2024 (UTC)