User talk:Samuel Wiki/Archive 3

Bots/Requests for approval/KolBot
Hi there Kol, I've marked your BRfA as approved, so please feel free to start running once the account has the bot flag (presuming you want this). Cheers, - Kingpin13 (talk) 12:27, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the help!
Thanks for your help on the article Day of the Dead. I left a minor warning on that IP's talk page. It was kind of annoying, was just about to review all of the edits made and revert to a good version, but you beat me to it! Thanks again! Jmanfffreak (talk) 14:56, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILMS September 2010 Newsletter
The September 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:23, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Bot tasks for WikiProject Films
I would like to finalize the bot tasks for WikiProject Films for submission; the tasks so far are listed here. Are any of them problematic to accomplish? Do any of them need to be more specific on a technical level? I'd like to push for the bot request to be made since discussion appears to have tapered off. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 18:09, 18 October 2010 (UTC)


 * The task list has been updated since my previous message. Please let me know if any of the tasks cannot be done by a bot. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 19:46, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Hi, Kollision. It appears that has been inactive since last May. What should we do with the bot tasks? They're still listed at WikiProject Film/Bot requests. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 12:41, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * If Peppage does not respond, what do you recommend for the next step to be? We had a lot of good ideas for bot tasks, and I'd hate for them to go to waste. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 16:41, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The next step would be to create a request at Bot requests. In the request point to WikiProject Film/Bot requests and the source code for Peppage's bot and ask if someone would be willing to take over writing the bot. - Kollision (talk) 02:51, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM October 2010 Newsletter
The Octoberr 2010 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 00:46, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

DollyZoomTest.ogv
Moved from commons:File_talk:DollyZoomTest.ogv


 * Using 3D animation is a great idea, I can't believe no one did this earlier. The animation does a brilliant job illustrating what a dolly zoom is. Some suggestions:


 * 1) I think the funky colors are unnecessary
 * 2) Maybe you could make the balls into some other shape to make it stand out more against the blob person
 * It would be great if you create animations for other techniques in Category:Cinematography as well. - Kollision ( talk ) 06:40, 22 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I agree with 1 - it was just a simple colour scheme to run some tests. Once I have the basics down, I can move towards making it more realistic as an image, which should also tackle point 2.
 * As for other types of shot, any particular suggestions? I can't see anything obvious in that category, I'm afraid. One that springs to my mind is where there's a narrow depth of field and the focal point shifts between two objects/people in an otherwise static scene to change the "focus" of the viewer. But I don't know what that's called or even if there's an article on it. GDallimore ( talk ) 13:07, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I think what you're describing is racking focus (doesn't have any illustrations yet). Other articles that could use an animation are tilt, tracking shot, whip pan and panning. - Kollision ( talk ) 08:48, 31 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi. Since this has gone off-topic I thought I'd move it here for easier watching.
 * I've got hold of a free 3D female model (lucky me) and have started experimenting. I'm starting with something simple and will hopefully be uploading a video of Three-point lighting by the weekend. After that, I can try things like pan and tilt. Whip pan is likely to be out of the question: it's a technique that only works due to physical limitations of the equipment so attempting to recreate it in a computer would only be a (potentially misleading) simulation.
 * I'll be in touch. Thanks for the support! GDallimore (Talk) 00:55, 4 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Here we go. The lighting states need a bit of fiddling - fill light should be softer and rim light needs to light more of the top of the head. Other than that, any thoughts? GDallimore (Talk) 02:40, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Regarding your newer video, it looks good. Not sure if it would be better, but maybe you try just "switching on/off" the lights rather than fading in and out. And I think the second half of the video where all three lights are used needs to go a little bit slower. Other than that, good work.- Kollision (talk) 05:08, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Edge of Heaven
Thanks for working on the article. I wanted to question you about referring to it as a 'movie'. Seems to me it's a movie. What's your thinking? --Ring Cinema (talk) 16:29, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm guessing you're referring to the instances where I changed the word "movie" to "film" in the article. A film is the same thing as a movie, on Wikipedia we mainly use "film" because it is more professional. - Kollision (talk) 00:16, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure I completely agree. To me, a professional approach uses synonyms to give the article greater readability. --Ring Cinema (talk) 14:43, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't get you. What makes The Edge of Heaven a "movie" instead of a "film"? Why are you only changing this article to use "movie" while leaving others as "film". What makes The Edge of Heaven special? - Kollision (talk) 10:25, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILM November 2010 Newsletter
The November 2010 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:55, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, Kollision
Thank you for your corrections to my work. My intentions had been to share ideas, but I understand your implementation of the policy. If I can be of any further assistance to the Wikipedia project, please ask. My apologies if this is an inappropriate use of this forum (and I know you'll delete it if it is!).

Depth Charge (talk) 14:02, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for understanding. - Kollision (talk) 09:10, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Crusoe
Why did you remove Pauline Kael's remarks on deschanel's film Crusoe. Wouldn't they fit in the critical reception section o.k?. Whats wrong with her remarks? Sayerslle (talk) 21:20, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I made the judgement to remove her comments because there were some problems with it. Firstly, there was no attribution in the prose (eg. "Pauline Kael said"), it was just a quote dumped in the article. Secondly, it was quite a long quote. And thirdly, the quote was not the best because it flipped frequently between describing the film (which we don't want), describing Deschanel (which we also don't want) and the actually film criticism. However, looking back at it now I can see how these issues can be fixed and have reinstated her comments in edited form. - Kollision (talk) 02:20, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILM December 2010 Newsletter
The December 2010 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:04, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Just saw your comment from the 24th DEC (understand the FAR better now)
Was not aware that we had a procedure for questioning the articles on talk prior to bringing to FAR. The short challenge seems more reasonable based on that. (Not 100% sure that is the way to go, just saying much more understandable. And then that you could write down everything wrong with it.  Definitely makes me support a delist.)TCO (talk) 19:56, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * No worries. This is my first FAR submission so I wasn't quite sure how much to write. The FAR instructions just says to write "your reason(s) for nominating the article, specifying the FA criterion/criteria that are at issue" and I looked at the other FAR nominations and their opening remarks seemed quite short as well. I should probably have explained why I felt the article failed the comprehensiveness criteria in greater detail though. - Kollision (talk) 11:31, 28 January 2011 (UTC)


 * You were following the normal procedure. I may have a little bit of a disagreement with the normal procedure in that it seems not self-consistent. We say that the purpose of FAR is to save the articles.  But allowing peremptory challenges does not lean towards saving the article.


 * The other thing is it's just hard to tell from a sentence or two if the challenge is likely justified. I think the nominating de-lister ought to take it on himself to write a little exec summary of why he thinks it should be delisted, so others have some of that work done for them.  Otherwise it is just a flag that says "go read the article yourself".  I just don't think that is time-efficient.  And I think if the delister fleshes out his rationale a bit, it helps the whole process be more concrete and meaningful.


 * Don't think there is a need for a "general" review unless we think the peice is just "generally" flawed and that why nominating. Realistically I doubt we take too many stars away because of a couple prose boners (even if we stop from giving stars for that reason)!  So I would do that more in the context of a general rehabilitation, where the article is being upgraded already (i.e. the saver is present).


 * Other benefit of just explaining in more quantification the rationale for the delist is it gives us a little more feel for how far away the thing is. Not saying you have to express it this way, but knowing if it's a one day job or a one week job helps any "rescue squad" type decide if they will make the effort. Think this is reasonable in the context about FAR being about "hoping to save the article by upgrade".  This is speculative, but I find that when I write down a hit list and sorta turn it into...well the beginning...the skeleton of a work plan that it motivates me to do the work.  I see the size and the main items.  I bet there are some delisters who would even say to heck with it and turn into the article saver!  And not saying you should.


 * I think it's fine to note that the author is away. I apologize, I read it like a rationale for why to kill the thing (because the saver is gone! ;-))  Would maybe just do it in a separate para and not make it a rationale for delist but more a discussion of how you've tried to help the article (note the 24DEC outreach) and what you expect to go down in the FAR.  It's a subtle thing and no biggie honest.  Probably the "veterans" knew what you meant.TCO (talk) 17:44, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM January 2011 Newsletter
The January 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:14, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Perfume
Fantastic work. Danger (talk) 12:33, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Gee thanks. - Kollision (talk) 13:51, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM February 2011 Newsletter
The February 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:16, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

you stud!
Really respect you on the FAR for that niche movie.

P.s. Will you please review my featured list, "[U.S. state reptiles]]"?

TCO (talk) 05:06, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

thanks for the feedback
I implemented several of them. there were a few where I didn't but I certainly got your point and stopped to consider! TCO (talk) 08:12, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM March 2011 Newsletter
The March 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 21:12, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks
Hello Kollision. Just wanted to say thanks for your work on the plot section of the film The Fall. Considering the narrative of the film that plot section is a tough one to cut down and I think you did a good job. Thanks also for adding the pictures of the locations. I have a purely aesthetic suggestion. I think that the pics might look better if the are arranged vertically instead of horizontally. I guess that I am just used to that arrangement in most WikiP articles. I also think that the pics could be a bit bigger if they were vertical. This is just a suggestion and if you prefer them the way they are than that is fine with me. On another note I have found some clips from Yo Ho Ho at Youtube and it is interesting to see parts of the film that inspired Tarsem. Thanks for your time and cheers. MarnetteD | Talk 15:48, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the feedback. I think the Filming locations list should be converted into prose. That's why I've made the images horizontal, as a way to encourage that. When the list is converted to prose, the current "height" of the images would be appropriate for the "height" of the text. - Kollision (talk) 05:51, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * That makes sense. Thanks for taking the time to let me know your reasoning. Enjoy the rest of your weekend. MarnetteD | Talk 15:47, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM April 2011 Newsletter
The April 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 22:46, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM May 2011 Newsletter
The May 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 01:49, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:101320051100550000 full.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:101320051100550000 full.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Retitled image, All incoming links updated

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:40, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM June 2011 Newsletter
The June 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. We are also seeking new members to assist in writing the newsletter, if interested please leave a note on the Outreach department's talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:42, 2 July 2011 (UTC)


 * TB-2 found it... Skier Dude  ( talk ) 04:04, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Alpha and Omega poster.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Alpha and Omega poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 04:42, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM July 2011 Newsletter
The July 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. We are also seeking new members to assist in writing the newsletter, if interested please leave a note on the Outreach department's talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:56, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Perth meetup
There is a meetup happening this weekend in Perth, if you're interested. (You're in Category:Wikipedians in Perth.) &mdash; Sam Wilson ( Talk &bull; Contribs ) &hellip; 07:54, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM September 2011 Newsletter
The September 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 16:42, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

2011 WikiProject Film coordinator election
Voting for WikiProject Film's October 2011 project coordinator election has started. We are aiming to select five coordinators to serve for the next year; please take a moment from editing to vote here by October 29! Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 12:02, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM October 2011 Newsletter
The October 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 15:05, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Film November 2011 Newsletter
The  2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Peppage (talk &#124; contribs) 22:40, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Film December 2011 Newsletter
The December 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Peppage (talk &#124; contribs) 22:07, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Film's January–February Newsletter
The January 2012 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

To unsubscribe, please remove your name from the distribution list. GRAPPLE  X  00:41, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Alpha and Omega poster.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Alpha and Omega poster.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:08, 1 January 2013 (UTC)