User talk:Samuelgilman

Changzhou
Samuelgilman, thanks for your edits at Changzhou. Unfortunately, I have to at least tag the bit about the dinosaur park with, because if you're basing that evaluation on your personal experience (from when you went there with students and for a date) then it qualifies as original research (see WP:OR for more about Wikipedia's policy). If you can find a reliable source saying that the park is mostly for children, you would be welcome to add it (let me know if you have any questions about how to add footnotes for sources). Politizer talk / contribs 03:19, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Notability of Jiangsu teachers University of Science and Technology
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Jiangsu teachers University of Science and Technology, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Jiangsu teachers University of Science and Technology seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Jiangsu teachers University of Science and Technology, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 14:30, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ctunnel
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ctunnel, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Notability not asserted or established, no sources cited.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Beeblebrox (talk) 05:59, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Ctunnel
A tag has been placed on Ctunnel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Beeblebrox (talk) 06:56, 8 May 2009 (UTC)