User talk:Samuelhar90

CS1 error on Prateek Sharma (gastroenterologist)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Prateek Sharma (gastroenterologist), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Samuelhar90&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1184638300 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:32, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Prateek_Sharma_(gastroenterologist)&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1184638300%7CPrateek%20Sharma%20(gastroenterologist)%5D%5D Ask for help])

Mischaracterization of previous reverts on Prateek Sharma
You stated the following in an edit summary: "Reminder to consider diverse sources; labeling them as unreliable by default perpetuates bias and can be perceived as a form of white washing. Also emphasizing the importance of equitable representation for scientists from all backgrounds. Noting a tendency for editors to revert non-Western sources, resulting in extensive profiles for Western scientists and less for their non-Western counterparts."

This is not why previous additions were reverted. The last set of changes were reverted because you used Wikipedia as a source multiple times. That is not allowed in any Wikipedia article per WP:CIRC. Also, per some recent additions, Wikipedia takes a dim view to using articles for promotional or marketing purposes, and so creating the sense of a résumé instead of a reliably, independently sourced article is generally frowned upon, no matter who the subject is or where they come from.

Last, I take umbrage of you using an edit summary to strike back against something that did not happen as some kind of defense for any content you choose to add. Please understand that only Wikipedia guidelines and policies matter here, and baseless accusations DO NOT. Stefen Towers among the rest!  Gab • Gruntwerk 19:18, 11 November 2023 (UTC)