User talk:Samwickers

April 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mohammad Munaf (cricketer) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mohammad Munaf (cricketer) was changed by Samwickers (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861686 on 2014-04-12T14:35:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:35, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hypsotropa ocraceella with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. — Mel bourne Star ☆ talk 14:35, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Messages
I would like to dispute the reverted edits which were made. Could you please explain to me why the edits I made were reverted without prior notice or discussion? Many thanks.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Carlos Bousoño with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. — Mel bourne Star ☆ talk 15:12, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

I think you are mistaken by continuing to revert the edits made by me. This is further elicited by the open threats made against me in your last comment. Considering how you ignored my previous message addressed to you, I would like to again discuss matters concerning your actions against me.Samwickers (talk) 15:20, 12 April 2014 (UTC)samwickers


 * ,, , . If it were up to me, you would have lost your editing privelages by now, as it seems you're here to disrupt the encyclopedia. I kindly suggest you stop vandalizing; it's a waste of our time, but moreso yours, as it must take a lot of energy to make those silly edits, versus one click of a button which removes them. Please stop it, — Mel bourne Star ☆ talk 15:30, 12 April 2014 (UTC)


 * If having a sense of humour is an offence, I must be a jailed criminal by now. And I would like to inform you that you misspelt 'encyclopaedia' as 'encyclopedia' in your message. Samwickers (talk) 16:04, 12 April 2014 (UTC)samwickers
 * Wikipedia is not the place for that kind of "humour". If you do persist, you may be blocked. And in response to your other comment, there are different variants of English that spell 'encyclopedia' as 'encyclopaedia'.