User talk:Samyab502

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vinod Mishra (November 1)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vinod Mishra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden (talk) 19:49, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Dipankar Bhattacharya have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. CAPTAIN RAJU ( ✉ ) 20:02, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Dipankar Bhattacharya. I noticed that when you added the image to the infobox, you added it as a thumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

SomeImage.jpg

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 04:03, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vinod Mishra. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:57, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Vinod Mishra was changed by Samyab502 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.870706 on 2016-11-03T04:57:21+00:00.

November 2016
Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 16:22, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 16:33, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Restoring copyright violation text
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 17:00, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Sorry for everything. I am a new comer. I joned ths month only. I didnt read the rules properly. This is my fault i accept. And i will not do tge same thing again i promise. Samyab502 (talk) 10:46, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Copyright violations
Hi Samyab502. I am Diannaa and I am an administrator on this wiki. Almost all of the content you added to Communist Party of India (Marxist–Leninist) Liberation was copied from other websites and other Wikipedia articles. Copying Wikipedia articles is okay as long as you state in the edit summary where you copied the content from. This is required so that the attribution required under the terms of our CC-by-SA is provided to the original contributor(s). However, you can't copy material from other websites, including the website of the Communist Party of India (Marxist–Leninist) Liberation. Doing that is a copyright violation. Please stop editing and take the time to read these: Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:42, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Copyrights
 * Copying within Wikipedia

November 2016
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content, as you did at Communist Party of India (Marxist–Leninist) Liberation. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:46, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked, as you added copyright content copied from http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chandigarh/MNREGS-honour-for-Mansa-village/articleshow/50842406.cms. We cannot accept copyright content, so sorry. Everything you add to this wiki needs to be written in your own words please. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:48, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello maam, very sorry  for my behaviour. I wanted to talk to you about the editions I made on your first message only but i was unable because i didnt know how to use the talk page. I am new in wikipedia and join ths month only. When i read your first message i understood my falt and wrote everting in my words execept two lines that i added at the end of the CPI(ML) Liberation page under the heading of states>punjab>tamkot village, mansa from the link > http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chandigarh/MNREGS-honour-for-Mansa-village/articleshow/50842406.cms. These was the lines i added becuse i didnt understand wat different i can write from it > union minister Birender Singh honoured tamkot village of Mansa in Delhi for suitably implementing MGNREGS in 2014-15. Tamkot was also honoured with Panchayat Sashaktikaran Puraskar (last year) by union rural development ministry for "visionary work". I DIDNT UNDERSATAND WHAT DIFFERENCE IT WILL MAKE IF I WRITE THE SAME THING DIFFERENTLY. But i accept my fault and i promise not to do the same fault again. Please give me last chance. If you want you can keep a track of what ever i do next. But i promise that i will not edit like ths again. I am new so i didnt know the rules. Yes you proveded me the rule in your first message but i wanted to communicate with you and finally i searched and learned how to communicate. With all respect Please understand my failure as a new comer. And i will not commit the same crime again. I request you to please remove the block. I promise i will remain a good student. Samyab502 (talk) 10:42, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

unblock request
Before filing another unblock request, can you please answer me this question : What things are you allowed to do with Wikipedia content given the copyright rules, what things can you do that some might find surprising, and what things can you definitely not do? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  18:40, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note this user has used the account,, in order to avoid the block. --Yamla (talk) 15:28, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Ths was the things that happend: copyright content copied from http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chandigarh/MNREGS-honour-for-Mansa-village/articleshow/50842406.cms. We cannot accept copyright content, so sorry. Everything you add to this wiki needs to be written in your own words please. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:48, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

My msg to Diaana: Hello maam, very sorry for my behaviour. I wanted to talk to you about the editions I made on your first message only but i was unable because i didnt know how to use the talk page. I am new in wikipedia and join ths month only. When i read your first message i understood my falt and wrote everting in my words execept two lines that i added at the end of the CPI(ML) Liberation page under the heading of states>punjab>tamkot village, mansa from the link > http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chandigarh/MNREGS-honour-for-Mansa-village/articleshow/50842406.cms. These was the lines i added becuse i didnt understand wat different i can write from it > union minister Birender Singh honoured tamkot village of Mansa in Delhi for suitably implementing MGNREGS in 2014-15. Tamkot was also honoured with Panchayat Sashaktikaran Puraskar (last year) by union rural development ministry for "visionary work". I DIDNT UNDERSATAND WHAT DIFFERENCE IT WILL MAKE IF I WRITE THE SAME THING DIFFERENTLY. But i accept my fault and i promise not to do the same fault again. Please give me last chance. If you want you can keep a track of what ever i do next. But i promise that i will not edit like ths again. I am new so i didnt know the rules. Yes you proveded me the rule in your first message but i wanted to communicate with you and finally i searched and learned how to communicate. With all respect Please understand my failure as a new comer. And i will not commit the same crime again. I request you to please remove the block. After ths i requested a unblock. But i didnt get any reply form diaana. I dont have any other account. Sbhatt is my friends account whom i told ths problem. Since my request was not reviewed and i did not get any reply till today. My friend sbhatt made the edits as requested by diaana from his accounr with enough resourses as diaana requested. And then today diaana even blocked him even after giving enough resource.dear administrators kindly riview the edits made by sbhatt and pls tell what information is lacking and which copywright was violated by him? as Ritchie requested for an evidance, kindly visit my edit log and see wat other edits i have doñe other than ths particulàr page( communist party of india (marxist-leninist)liberation). I assure you that you will find no such "violation" for the edits i made in the last month when i opened ths account. Thank you. Samyab502 (talk) 15:46, 25 November 2016 (UTC) Samyab502 (talk) 15:46, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Many times we have seen people who create an account to evade their block claim that their little brother or their friend just happened to be interested in the same subject and performed the edits. Regardless, if you asked Sbhatt to edit on your behalf, that's no different than if you created the account yourself to evade your block. Both are considered to be block evasion. Looking at your contributions so far since you started editing at the beginning of November, I see everything you have edited is related to the political party Communist Party of India (Marxist–Leninist) Liberation. While it's not that unusual that new editors are You also evaded your block by editing the article without logging in.interested in one topic only, I have to ask you: Are you affiliated with that party, working for them, or connected to them in any way? If so, you have a conflict of interest and should not be editing that article at all. Regarding the copyright violations, I notice you say above that you can't think of any other way to word stuff and that's why you copied directly from elsewhere. This is not okay. If you don't have the English language skills to write your own prose, you're not going to be able to edit here effectively. It's not at all clear that you understand copyright law and how it applies to Wikipedia editing, because the last thing you say in your most recent post is that you have not committed any copyright violations since you opened this account a month ago. That is not true; most of your additions to the article were copied directly from the organization's website, in violation of copyright law and the policies of this website. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:01, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. I waited for your reply when I message you about the block, when you blocked me about two weeks ago. Thanks for your reply - " I notice you say above that you can't think of any other way to word stuff and that's why you copied directly from elsewhere. This is not okay. If you don't have the English language skills to write your own prose, you're not going to be able to edit here effectively." I asked you how to edit that particular subject and what difference it will make if I wright it in a different way. Now I understand that there is know another way.

As you said - "most of your additions to the article were copied directly from the organization's website, in violation of copyright law and the policies of this website." For the above allegation, I accepted my crime in the text that I send you just after you blocked me. But you never replied till now. I also accepted my crime in the above unblock request.

As you said - "You also evaded your block by editing the article without logging in." Yes its true I did so because I had no other way left. I texted you but you didn't reply. I send an unblock request but you didn't reply. The allegation you made that I have to wright in my own words that's what I did without logging in. I knew that you will be notified, I thought you will at least read my texts that I send you and will give me a proper advice. I waited but you didn't. and finally as you said regarding the evidence I provided - "Looking at your contributions so far since you started editing at the beginning of November, I see everything you have edited is related to the political party Communist Party of India (Marxist–Leninist) Liberation." Yes you are right that from the beginning I had been doing edits regarding this subject. Political science and History is my field of interest but that does not prove that I am a particular parties member. I was going through the pages related to communism in India and I found some pages regarding this particular party not very clear, so I started editing. I saw your page that you are recently busy editing pages related to the Nazi Party and Nazi Germany but does that prove that you are a Nazi Party member?

As you alleged - "Many times we have seen people who create an account to evade their block claim that their little brother or their friend just happened to be interested in the same subject and performed the edits. Regardless, if you asked Sbhatt to edit on your behalf, that's no different than if you created the account yourself to evade your block. Both are considered to be block evasion."" most of your additions to the article were copied directly from the organization's website, in violation of copyright law and the policies of this website." I accepted my crime of copyright violation regarding this page repeatedly in the text that I sent you (I said that I am a new comer as I just joined in this November and requested you to give a final chance).I also accepted my crime in the above unblock request and even in this text. The last time you blocked me, you advised me not to copy texts but to right it myself. But you never gave me a chance. So I had to ask sbhatt to do it for me, to wright it in his own words and add sufficient references. And that's what he did. I had to take a chance to show you that I have improved and I had not copied any text and added sufficient resource. But instead of any advice or communication or any reply (to my early messages to you personally) and via the unblock request you never communicated with me or sbhatt. Rather you blocked him too. You may allege that samyab502 and sbhatt are the same persons but the truth remains that you never communicated till today except blocking us repeatedly. Thanks for the reply again. I hope you will understand and give me advice and a final chance on how to resolve this problem. Thanks for everything. And sorry for everything. Hope you will reply. Samyab502 (talk) 10:01, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
 * You say, "I did so because I had no other way left". This is simply not true. You could have continued to wait. Asking another person to help you avoid your block and to continue committing copyright violations isn't the way forward. Additionally, I'm disturbed at the apparent claim that you have been violating WP:COI. Can you please clearly state your relationship with the Communist Party of India? I want to be clear, the only concern here is whether or not you've been violating WP:COI as well as WP:COPYRIGHT and WP:BLOCK and WP:SOCK. --Yamla (talk) 16:14, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply.I am a new comer.I didn't know whom to ask. I thought diannaa would reply but she didn't. No one replied to my ublock request too till today (I waited for almost 1 week). I understand now that I should have waited for other administrators and that my request is not visible to only diannaa but other administrators too. I told in the above reply to diannaa that political science and history is my field of interest. I was going through the pages related to communism in India and in the pages related to Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) Liberation I found that the informations were not clear so I started editing. No I am not a member of Communist Party of India and I don't have any relations to it. As I said in the above reply to diannaa that I saw diannaa (as she mentioned in the user page) editing series related to Nazi Germany and Nazi Party, does that prove that diannaa is a Nazi party member or she has any relationship with Nazi party? Thank You. For the other charges you put against me, I have already replied to diannaa on the same allegations in the last reply to her comment. Hope you understand and give me a final chance or any advice so that this problem can be resolved. Thanks for your reply.Samyab502 (talk) 17:43, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Some of the stuff you have just said is not true. You posted your unblock request on November 18, and on November 19 - the very next day - you resumed editing the article without logging in, and added additional copyright violations. The unblock request was declined on the fourth day (not a week later as you state). The account User:Sbhatt was created on the 24th, the day after your unblock request was declined, and that account continued to add copyright violations to the article. It's not okay to repeatedly break the rules and evade your block by editing while logged out, or creating new accounts or asking a friend to edit on your behalf to continue to insert copyright violations into the article. Our copyright policy is an official Wikipedia policy with legal ramifications and it's still not clear to me that you are able or willing to abide by that very important policy. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:56, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. I have given enough reasons to you and Yamla. It is my heartfelt request to give me a last chance. My last chance will surely clear your confusion that you said about. I will abide to the rules and I am saying this with my full conscious effort. My last chance will be the proof of the fact that I am able to follow the rules, Through my last chance i will prove myself to you that I abide to your words and to the rules of wikipedia to 100%. Thank you. Hence forth, I eagerly await for a positve reply from you. Samyab502 (talk) 21:47, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * A post appears at User talk:Sbhatt and fifteen minutes later there's a post here as well. I have trouble believing the same person is not controlling both accounts. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:05, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I agree. --Yamla (talk) 01:07, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for being so suspicious. Is it really so interesting to become suspicious on the same issue repeatedly? I am already charged with that rule where you say that asking for a friends help is illegal and where you can consider that both the accounts are of same person. So if you already have set your mind that the two accounts are of the same person according to rule then why you accuse me repeatedly? I already said that I didn't understand that time. I have given enough reasons. Common please. Give me at least one last chance to let me prove that I abide to the rules from now on, and let me get clear out of so many accusation by proving myself. Hey Yamla, I heard from my friend, you said that you will be happy to help him out. And yes, this will be really helpful to me too. Is this the help you are doing? Was that "happy to help" trick just a trap to anyhow prove your inconvenience? Thank you. Samyab502 (talk) 06:46, 28 November 2016 (UTC)