User talk:Samyakesesem

September 2020
Hello, I'm GermanJoe. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GermanJoe (talk) 10:44, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Doubt
How to know which article was edited out by moderator? ,...... Samyakesesem (talk) 16:54, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Hello, Samyakesesem, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. RegentsPark (comment) 18:23, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Plz com Samyakesesem (talk) 16:58, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Plz connect the accounts Samyakesesem (talk) 16:59, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
 * The accounts cannot be connected. But, if you login as, you can ask for that account to be indef blocked so that you don't accidentally use it (that way, we'll know that you and Esesem are the same). Then, you can continue editing with this account. --RegentsPark (comment) 17:08, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

It seems a part of my input have been deleted. But I honestly didn't copy them anything directly from the book. I had myself written a short summary by compressing around two pages and added them. I dont know why it got deleted under 'copyright' issues, but I will leave it here. Samyakesesem (talk) 19:41, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Sourcing
Please only use scholarly sources for the article on Gandhi. He is a much researched person and it is relatively easy to find good sources for anything about him that is relevant. The mkgandhi faqs you're using are not acceptable as a source. --RegentsPark (comment) 21:17, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for the honest reason this time. However the Wikipedia article seems incomplete. I will use some other source next time for editing. Samyakesesem (talk) 05:14, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020 copyright essentials
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Mahatma Gandhi, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:
 * Copying text from other sources
 * Policy on copyright
 * Frequently asked questions on Wikipedia's copyright policy
 * Policy and guideline on non-free content

If you still have questions, there is the teahouse, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.


 * Introduction
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 13:39, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

I have added my latest input just now. This time there is no copying of any sentence. Even if some words or phrases look similar to the original, it was unavoidable. I have added extra references too. Samyakesesem (talk) 18:22, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Your edit to Mahatma Gandhi has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 18:06, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

April 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission, as you did at Muddiman Committee. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 21:47, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

You had several warnings for this on your previous account User:Esesem as well as this one. Looking at a recent edit of yours to Muddiman Committee, I found overlap with the Banglapedia source, which is not under an acceptable license, therefore meaning we cannot copy from it. I've bolded the similarity:"Lord Birkenhead, the Secretary of State for India, stated that actions would be taken on the basis of the majority report. The majority view, made by officials and loyalists, stated that the existing Constitution was working in most provinces and was affording valuable political experience. Detailed recommendations were made for improving machinery of the government as they felt that the system had not been given a fair trial. The minority view was that dyarchy had absolutely failed and could not succeed at all in the future. According to them, it was only a fundamental change in the Constitution with a provision for automatic progress in the future, which could bring about the improvement.'"I understand that it is difficult to paraphrase some material, but in this case there were several phrases that didn't need to be included in the article. If you want to be unblocked, you'll need to prove a much better understanding of paraphrasing and stating content in your own words. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 21:57, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Note also that you are blocked. You the person, not just this account. If you set up another account, this would be a violation of WP:EVADE and WP:SOCK. Until this account is unblocked, you are not permitted to edit here. --Yamla (talk) 10:23, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

This is not correct. You have missed WP:FAIRUSE. --Yamla (talk) 14:06, 26 April 2021 (UTC)